Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KNIGHT, SAMANTHA JO | 1 | 31.3% | +73.3% |
| KOVACH, KARA NICOLE | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| ARMATO JR, DENNIS IGNATIUS | 1 | 56.3% | +70.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18290188 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR USE IN IDENTIFYING OR QUANTIFYING MICROORGANISMS | KOVACH, KARA NICOLE | 54d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18717656 | NEW USES OF PHENMEDIPHAM AND HERBICIDAL COMBINATIONS COMPRISING PHENMEDIPHAM | KNIGHT, SAMANTHA JO | 19d |
| 17778488 | METHODS OF FERMENTATION OF RECOMBINANT BACILLUS SPORES | ARMATO JR, DENNIS IGNATIUS | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1614 | 1 |
| 1681 | 1 |
| 1651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18717656 | NEW USES OF PHENMEDIPHAM AND HERBICIDAL COMBINATIONS COMPRISING PHENMEDIPHAM | KNIGHT, SAMANTHA JO | 1614 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d | Pending | Jun 07, 2024 |
| 18290188 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR USE IN IDENTIFYING OR QUANTIFYING MICROORGANISMS | KOVACH, KARA NICOLE | 1681 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 54d | Pending | Nov 10, 2023 |
| 17778488 | METHODS OF FERMENTATION OF RECOMBINANT BACILLUS SPORES | ARMATO JR, DENNIS IGNATIUS | 1651 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 41d | Pending | May 20, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial