Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Beam Tech Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company patent portfolio's active engagement with the patent office. The filing reflects a specialized focus on software developments.
The prosecution effort is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This concentration indicates that the portfolio is subject to a narrow range of examination standards. Working with 1 distinct art unit allows the applicant to focus on a specific body of prior art.
CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE is the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 pending office action. As the only examiner involved, this individual's review is the central factor in the portfolio's current progress. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of this 1 pending office action to achieve a successful outcome.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE | 1 | 76.3% | +22.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18312211 | Personalized Heating System | CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18312211 | Personalized Heating System | CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2118 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18312211 | Personalized Heating System | CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE | 2118 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | May 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial