Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
BERTIN TECHNOLOGIES currently has 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is occurring within a distinct art unit, indicating a focused application of the company's communications technology. This concentration allows for a very specific and direct prosecution strategy that targets the particular requirements of the assigned technical group.
The presence of a pending office action and a distinct examiner means that the portfolio's immediate progress depends on the examination process. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D and the standards of the Communications technology area. This concentrated activity suggests a targeted approach to securing patent protection for a specific innovation. With only a pending office action, the company can dedicate its full attention to the feedback provided by the examiner assigned to the case, ensuring a thorough response.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D | 1 | 83.5% | +15.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18878566 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CALIBRATION INFORMATION AND GENERATING IMAGES FOR AN IMAGE SENSOR AND ASSOCIATED IMAGE SENSOR | DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18878566 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CALIBRATION INFORMATION AND GENERATING IMAGES FOR AN IMAGE SENSOR AND ASSOCIATED IMAGE SENSOR | DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2638 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18878566 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CALIBRATION INFORMATION AND GENERATING IMAGES FOR AN IMAGE SENSOR AND ASSOCIATED IMAGE SENSOR | DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D | 2638 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial