Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Betek GmbH & Co. Kg

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Betek GmbH & Co. Kg has 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, with each examiner responsible for 1 case. The portfolio is active across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's chemical innovations are being reviewed by a small number of specialized groups. This distribution requires the management of 3 separate examiner relationships simultaneously.

BEHRENS, ADAM J is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, matching the workload of the other 2 distinct examiners. With 3 pending office actions in total, the company's prosecution is spread across 2 distinct art units, which may involve different examination guidelines. The fact that 3 distinct examiners are involved for 3 pending office actions means there is no single point of contact for the entire portfolio. Practitioners must ensure that technical definitions remain consistent across these 2 distinct art units.

Managing 3 pending office actions across 3 distinct examiners provides a variety of feedback on the company's patent applications. BEHRENS, ADAM J handles 1 pending office action, representing a portion of the active matters. Because the work is situated in 2 distinct art units, the company can compare the examination styles of these different groups. This structure ensures that the chemistry and materials portfolio is not overly dependent on the discretion of 1 examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BEHRENS, ADAM J 1 77.3% +12.1%
DUMBRIS, SETH M 1 76.4% +16.6%
LIANG, ANTHONY M 1 83.5% +9.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18286431 Cemented carbide material LIANG, ANTHONY M —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18286436 Process for the production of a cemented carbide material having a reinforced binder phase DUMBRIS, SETH M 27d
18865077 Hard-metal protection for landsides BEHRENS, ADAM J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1784 1
1734 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18865077 Hard-metal protection for landsides BEHRENS, ADAM J — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18286436 Process for the production of a cemented carbide material having a reinforced binder phase DUMBRIS, SETH M 1784 §103Other Final Rejection 27d Pending Oct 11, 2023
18286431 Cemented carbide material LIANG, ANTHONY M 1734 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2023

Managing Betek GmbH & Co. Kg's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month