Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| §102 only | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TURK, BROCK E | 1 | 28.9% | +34.7% |
| PATEL, DIVESH | 1 | 52.9% | +39.7% |
| CUNNINGHAM II, GREGORY S | 1 | 65.0% | +33.5% |
| PATEL, HIREN P | 1 | 78.7% | +37.4% |
| POE, KEVIN T | 1 | 39.6% | +16.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15359604 | BILL PAYMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BILL SPLITTEES | POE, KEVIN T | 4d overdue |
| 18950947 | DYNAMIC HIERARCHICAL LEDGER | TURK, BROCK E | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17809881 | TRANSACTION HEALTH MONITORING AND FAULT-TOLERANT ROUTING | CUNNINGHAM II, GREGORY S | 15d overdue |
| 17546733 | ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION AND TRANSACTION PROCESSING | PATEL, HIREN P | 4d overdue |
| 15359604 | BILL PAYMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BILL SPLITTEES | POE, KEVIN T | 4d overdue |
| 17809875 | VIRTUAL TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT | PATEL, DIVESH | 23d |
| 18950947 | DYNAMIC HIERARCHICAL LEDGER | TURK, BROCK E | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3692 | 2 |
| 3696 | 1 |
| 3694 | 1 |
| 2196 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18950947 | DYNAMIC HIERARCHICAL LEDGER | TURK, BROCK E | 3692 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Nov 18, 2024 |
| 17809875 | VIRTUAL TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT | PATEL, DIVESH | 3696 | §103 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | Jun 29, 2022 |
| 17809881 | TRANSACTION HEALTH MONITORING AND FAULT-TOLERANT ROUTING | CUNNINGHAM II, GREGORY S | 3694 | §102 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Jun 29, 2022 |
| 17546733 | ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION AND TRANSACTION PROCESSING | PATEL, HIREN P | 2196 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Dec 09, 2021 |
| 15359604 | BILL PAYMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BILL SPLITTEES | POE, KEVIN T | 3692 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Nov 22, 2016 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial