Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
BINDETHICS LTD. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution effort for the company is concentrated on this single application, requiring a focused strategy in the chemistry sector.
PATWARDHAN, ABHISHEK A is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing the 1 pending office action. This individual is the sole examiner currently reviewing pending matters for the portfolio. Because the company has only 1 action total, its immediate progress at the patent office is entirely dependent on the review and feedback of this specific official. Practitioners should tailor their strategy to the preferences of this examiner within the 1 art unit to ensure a favorable outcome for the application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATWARDHAN, ABHISHEK A | 1 | 73.9% | +13.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19266748 | ADHESIVE FORMULATIONS | PATWARDHAN, ABHISHEK A | 26d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1746 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19266748 | ADHESIVE FORMULATIONS | PATWARDHAN, ABHISHEK A | 1746 | §103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | Jul 11, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial