Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Biolinq Incorporated

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Biolinq Incorporated manages a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area with 5 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 5 distinct examiners, showing a broad engagement across different individuals at the patent office. The prosecution activity spans 3 distinct art units, which indicates that the company's technology is being reviewed across several specialized technical groups. This distribution across 3 units suggests that the innovations touch upon multiple sub-specialties within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

KRETZER, KYLE W. is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, currently holding 1 pending office action. This means that while KRETZER, KYLE W. is the busiest, the workload is evenly distributed, as each of the 5 distinct examiners is likely handling 1 of the 5 pending actions. This distribution suggests that no single examiner has a dominant influence over the entire pending portfolio. For practitioners, this requires navigating the different standards and practices of 5 separate examiners, which may lead to varying prosecution timelines and outcomes.

The 5 to 5 ratio of pending actions to examiners further emphasizes a diverse prosecution landscape where each application is facing a unique set of examiner expectations. Practitioners should be prepared to manage multiple examiner relationships simultaneously, as the data shows no concentration of actions under a single official. The involvement of 3 distinct art units adds another layer of complexity, as each unit may have its own internal guidelines and examination culture. This profile represents a decentralized prosecution environment for the company's current intellectual property assets.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (40%)
§103 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KRETZER, KYLE W. 1 64.8% +41.5%
TOMBERS, JOSEPH A 1 49.8% +32.1%
VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT 1 30.3% +47.0%
CHUNG, HOSUNG CHARLES 1 59.1% +38.3%
HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 1 41.4% +52.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18634420 INTEROPERABILITY AND DATA EXCHANGE CAPABILITIES BETWEEN A BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITOR AND A CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITOR TOMBERS, JOSEPH A 34d
18830480 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR THE MITIGATION OF NON-ANALYTE SIGNAL PERTURBATIONS INCIDENT UPON ANALYTE-SELECTIVE SENSOR KRETZER, KYLE W. —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18243623 HEALTH-RELATED SIGNALING VIA WEARABLE ITEMS VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT 85d overdue
18634420 INTEROPERABILITY AND DATA EXCHANGE CAPABILITIES BETWEEN A BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITOR AND A CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITOR TOMBERS, JOSEPH A 34d
18830480 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR THE MITIGATION OF NON-ANALYTE SIGNAL PERTURBATIONS INCIDENT UPON ANALYTE-SELECTIVE SENSOR KRETZER, KYLE W. —
17850832 TISSUE-PENETRATING ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSOR FEATURING A CO-ELECTRODEPOSITED THIN FILM COMPRISED OF POLYMER AND BIO-RECOGNITION ELEMENT CHUNG, HOSUNG CHARLES —
17348651 Devices and Methods For Application Of Microneedle Arrays Using Radial And Axial Accelerations HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2
1687 1
1794 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18830480 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR THE MITIGATION OF NON-ANALYTE SIGNAL PERTURBATIONS INCIDENT UPON ANALYTE-SELECTIVE SENSOR KRETZER, KYLE W. — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18634420 INTEROPERABILITY AND DATA EXCHANGE CAPABILITIES BETWEEN A BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITOR AND A CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITOR TOMBERS, JOSEPH A 3791 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Apr 12, 2024
18243623 HEALTH-RELATED SIGNALING VIA WEARABLE ITEMS VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT 1687 §112DP Final Rejection 85d overdue Pending Sep 07, 2023
17850832 TISSUE-PENETRATING ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSOR FEATURING A CO-ELECTRODEPOSITED THIN FILM COMPRISED OF POLYMER AND BIO-RECOGNITION ELEMENT CHUNG, HOSUNG CHARLES 1794 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 27, 2022
17348651 Devices and Methods For Application Of Microneedle Arrays Using Radial And Axial Accelerations HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 3791 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 15, 2021

Managing Biolinq Incorporated's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month