Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bivision Pharmaceuticals Inc. is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This prosecution activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit and involves 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated review process for the company's current patent filings. The alignment of these resources suggests that the company is currently focused on a specific technical advancement within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.
CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This 1 action constitutes the entirety of the portfolio's 1 pending office action currently reported. Because there is only 1 matter active, this examiner holds all current responsibility for the company's pending outcomes. Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct examiner and the 1 distinct art unit involved create a singular point of contact at the patent office.
This concentrated structure simplifies the management of the 1 pending office action but also means the company's current success is tied to the interpretation of 1 individual. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit involved without the need to coordinate across multiple administrative divisions. The strategy for this portfolio should prioritize a deep understanding of the 1 distinct examiner's previous rulings.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE | 1 | 33.8% | +25.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18688290 | PEPTIDE-UREA DERIVATIVE, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME AND APPLICATION THEREOF | CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1618 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18688290 | PEPTIDE-UREA DERIVATIVE, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME AND APPLICATION THEREOF | CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE | 1618 | §102DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial