Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Blue Morpho AI LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the technology area of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. This prosecution activity is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the review process for the company. Furthermore, the active matter is situated within 1 distinct art unit, providing a consistent administrative framework for the pending application.
The busiest examiner assigned to this portfolio is SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z, who is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z is responsible for the only active case in the portfolio, the prosecution strategy can be tailored specifically to this individual's examination style. This concentration of work allows for a focused approach to addressing any technical or procedural rejections.
Practitioners should note that the combination of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector simplifies the management of the 1 pending office action. There is no need to coordinate across different art units or adapt to multiple examiner preferences. This structure allows the legal team to dedicate its full attention to the specific requirements of the assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z | 1 | 25.9% | +36.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18231612 | INTENTION ECONOMY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18231612 | INTENTION ECONOMY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18231612 | INTENTION ECONOMY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z | 3625 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Aug 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial