Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

BODITECH MED INC.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

BODITECH MED INC. is currently managing 4 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, which indicates that each individual case is receiving a unique evaluation. This lack of examiner overlap suggests that the company must tailor its arguments to 4 different sets of examiner preferences and communication styles to move its applications forward.

The 4 pending office actions are situated within 3 distinct art units. This concentration in a small number of art units relative to the number of examiners implies that while the personnel differ, the technical subject matter remains focused. HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action, which confirms that the workload is evenly spread across the 4 distinct examiners.

For a practitioner, the presence of 4 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units suggests a need for diverse advocacy within a narrow technical field. The fact that the busiest examiner, HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH, holds only 1 pending office action means that no single official dominates the current prosecution landscape. This portfolio structure requires monitoring the specific tendencies of each examiner to ensure consistent results across the 3 distinct art units involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 1 — —
BOECKER, JOSEPH D 1 83.6% +23.0%
MURPHY, VICTORIA 1 62.2% +46.1%
BUCHANAN, BAILEY CHEYENNE 1 42.9% +57.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18548108 DRUG AEROSOL SUPPLY APPARATUS FOR RESPIRATOR BOECKER, JOSEPH D 26d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18554157 METHOD FOR ANALYZING LIQUID IMMUNE RESPONSE USING MAGNETIC BEADS HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18548105 VENTILATOR MEDICATION INJECTION STRUCTURE MURPHY, VICTORIA 12d
18548108 DRUG AEROSOL SUPPLY APPARATUS FOR RESPIRATOR BOECKER, JOSEPH D 26d
17777108 METHOD FOR DETECTING AND QUANTIFYING TARGET NUCLEIC ACID IN REAL TIME USING SINGLE SIGNAL FLUORESCENT MATERIAL BUCHANAN, BAILEY CHEYENNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3785 2
1677 1
1682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18554157 METHOD FOR ANALYZING LIQUID IMMUNE RESPONSE USING MAGNETIC BEADS HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 1677 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 05, 2023
18548108 DRUG AEROSOL SUPPLY APPARATUS FOR RESPIRATOR BOECKER, JOSEPH D 3785 §103 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Aug 28, 2023
18548105 VENTILATOR MEDICATION INJECTION STRUCTURE MURPHY, VICTORIA 3785 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Aug 28, 2023
17777108 METHOD FOR DETECTING AND QUANTIFYING TARGET NUCLEIC ACID IN REAL TIME USING SINGLE SIGNAL FLUORESCENT MATERIAL BUCHANAN, BAILEY CHEYENNE 1682 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2022

Managing BODITECH MED INC.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month