Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Brown University

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

26 pending office actions • 24 art units • 26 examiners • 0 of 26 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Brown University has 26 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The matters involve 26 distinct examiners and 23 distinct art units, showing broad distribution across examination assignments rather than concentration in a small group of units.

HANNETT, JAMES M is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Because the busiest examiner has only 1 matter against a portfolio of 26 pending actions, a centralized examiner-specific strategy will have limited reach. Counsel should instead maintain matter-level tracking across the 23 art units and account for varied examination practices.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

26
Total Pending OAs
16
Non-Final OAs
10
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

13
Hard (50%)
9
Medium (35%)
4
Easy (15%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other8 (31%)
§103 only6 (23%)
§112 only4 (15%)
Double-patenting + other3 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (19%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

14
Life Sciences
54% of docket
2
Information Tech
8% of docket
4
Communications
15% of docket
2
Semiconductors
8% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
15% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

260 h
Manual time on pending OAs
52 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
91 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HANNETT, JAMES M 1 84.4% +0.5%
SCHNURR, JOHN R 1 72.1% +10.7%
CABRAL, ROBERT S 1 62.8% +32.3%
MCANANY, JOHN D 1 65.1% +46.4%
FORRISTALL, JOSHUA L 1 65.8% +15.3%
ROBERTS, ANNA L 1 55.7% +39.8%
SAPKOTA, SURAJ 1 0.0% +0.0%
MONTGOMERY, MELISSA JO 1 14.8% +40.0%
NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE 1 74.8% +15.7%
NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M 1 78.8% +29.6%

Hard Cases (14)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18185281 FRAMEWORK FOR SIMULATING GENERAL MULTI-SCALE PROBLEMS BARRETT, RYAN S 105d overdue
18656157 DISSECTING BETA WAVEFORMS USING CONVOLUTIONAL DICTIONARY LEARNING ACROSS SENSORY PERCEPTION, AGING, AND DISEASE ROBERTS, ANNA L 61d
19224557 SYSTEM FOR SPATIOTEMPORAL AUDIOVISUAL CAPTURE HANNETT, JAMES M —
18711899 COMPUTATIONS TRAINED MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF MATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL FLAWS FORRISTALL, JOSHUA L —
18436385 PROTEIN SEQUENCE DESIGN METHODS AND USES THEREOF TO PREVENT PROTEIN AGGREGATION SAPKOTA, SURAJ —
18578379 MENTAL IMAGE-BASED NEUROFEEDBACK TO IMPROVE COGNITIVE FUNCTION MONTGOMERY, MELISSA JO —
18391580 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING ROBOTS USING OBJECT-ORIENTED PARTIALLY OBSERVABLE MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE —
18513051 CELL AND COLLAGEN COMPOSITIONS FOR ENGINEERED CARDIAC TISSUE WRIGHT, ERIC BRANDON —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18539590 OBJECT-CENTRIC VIDEO REPRESENTATION FOR ACTION PREDICTION NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M 14d
18656157 DISSECTING BETA WAVEFORMS USING CONVOLUTIONAL DICTIONARY LEARNING ACROSS SENSORY PERCEPTION, AGING, AND DISEASE ROBERTS, ANNA L 61d
19172430 DEEP SURFACE LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY SCHNURR, JOHN R —
18920438 NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACES CABRAL, ROBERT S —
18784840 PROANGIOGENIC PROTEIN COCKTAILS DELIVERED IN CUSTOM BIOMATERIALS TO REVASCULARIZE ISCHEMIC TISSUE MCANANY, JOHN D —
18711899 COMPUTATIONS TRAINED MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF MATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL FLAWS FORRISTALL, JOSHUA L —
18578379 MENTAL IMAGE-BASED NEUROFEEDBACK TO IMPROVE COGNITIVE FUNCTION MONTGOMERY, MELISSA JO —
18391580 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING ROBOTS USING OBJECT-ORIENTED PARTIALLY OBSERVABLE MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2
1675 2
2639 1
2425 1
1614 1
1625 1
2857 1
1635 1
3658 1
2675 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19224557 SYSTEM FOR SPATIOTEMPORAL AUDIOVISUAL CAPTURE HANNETT, JAMES M 2639 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2025
19172430 DEEP SURFACE LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY SCHNURR, JOHN R 2425 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 07, 2025
18920438 NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACES CABRAL, ROBERT S 1614 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18784840 PROANGIOGENIC PROTEIN COCKTAILS DELIVERED IN CUSTOM BIOMATERIALS TO REVASCULARIZE ISCHEMIC TISSUE MCANANY, JOHN D 1625 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2024
18711899 COMPUTATIONS TRAINED MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF MATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL FLAWS FORRISTALL, JOSHUA L 2857 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 21, 2024
18656157 DISSECTING BETA WAVEFORMS USING CONVOLUTIONAL DICTIONARY LEARNING ACROSS SENSORY PERCEPTION, AGING, AND DISEASE ROBERTS, ANNA L 3791 §101§102§112 Final Rejection 61d Pending May 06, 2024
18436385 PROTEIN SEQUENCE DESIGN METHODS AND USES THEREOF TO PREVENT PROTEIN AGGREGATION SAPKOTA, SURAJ 1635 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 08, 2024
18578379 MENTAL IMAGE-BASED NEUROFEEDBACK TO IMPROVE COGNITIVE FUNCTION MONTGOMERY, MELISSA JO 3791 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 11, 2024
18391580 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING ROBOTS USING OBJECT-ORIENTED PARTIALLY OBSERVABLE MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE 3658 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2023
18539590 OBJECT-CENTRIC VIDEO REPRESENTATION FOR ACTION PREDICTION NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M 2675 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Dec 14, 2023
18513051 CELL AND COLLAGEN COMPOSITIONS FOR ENGINEERED CARDIAC TISSUE WRIGHT, ERIC BRANDON 1632 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2023
18500768 GENERALIZED THREE DIMENSIONAL MULTI-OBJECT SEARCH KEUP, AIDAN JAMES 2666 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 02, 2023
18481330 FIBER SUPPLEMENTATION PROTECTS FROM ANTIBIOTIC-INDUCED GUT MICROBIOME DYSBIOSIS BY MODULATING REDOX METABOLISM KRISHNAN, GANAPATHY 1693 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 05, 2023
18282679 PREDICTING VELOCIMETRY USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TSAI, TSUNG YIN 2656 §103 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Sep 18, 2023
18282463 CHARACTERIZING THE BINDING INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MUSK AND BMP RECEPTORS NICOL, ALEXANDER W 1634 §103DP Final Rejection 87d overdue Pending Sep 15, 2023
18451325 LANTHANIDE DOUBLE PEROVSKITE NANOCRYSTALS GROOMS, NOA WILLIAM FRAN 1759 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 17, 2023
18230810 NEUROENDOCRINE DIFFERENTIATION IN IMIPRIDONE CANCER TREATMENT SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH 1629 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2023
18230872 TESTING COLON CANCER DRUGS FOR IMMUNOMODULATORY EFFECTS GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M 1684 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2023
18275897 DEEP OPERATOR NETWORK ANDERSON, SCOTT C 3694 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 04, 2023
18260440 POLY-ARGININE DERIVATIVES FOR ENHANCING BRAIN-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR TO MITIGATE NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS LEE, JIA-HAI 1658 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 05, 2023
18339980 DECELLULARIZED MAMMALIAN EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX MORSELS, METHODS MAKING AND METHODS OF USING SAME LANDAU, SHARMILA GOLLAMUDI 1653 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 22, 2023
18185281 FRAMEWORK FOR SIMULATING GENERAL MULTI-SCALE PROBLEMS BARRETT, RYAN S 2148 §102§103Other Final Rejection 105d overdue Pending Mar 16, 2023
17917672 NANOTIP ION SOURCES AND METHODS GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 2881 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 07, 2022
17778375 BISPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AGAINST CHI3L1 AND CTLA4 WITH ENHANCED CYTOTOXIC EFFECTS ON TUMOR CELLS BERHANE, SELAM 1675 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 19, 2022
17769165 MUSCLE REGENERATION AND GROWTH CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N 1675 §112 Final Rejection 51d overdue Pending Apr 14, 2022
17265751 ORAL FORMULATIONS WITH INCREASED UPTAKE MITCHELL, EDWIN COLEMAN 1619 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2021

Managing Brown University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Brown University have?

Brown University has 26 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 24 art units and 26 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Brown University applications?

James M Hannett has the most, with 1 of Brown University's pending office actions.

What technology area are Brown University's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month