Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. has 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 4 distinct examiners, showing that each pending matter is assigned to a different individual. The portfolio is contained within 3 distinct art units, meaning at least one art unit is housing multiple examiners for this company.

MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. This workload is consistent with the overall distribution, as 4 distinct examiners share the 4 pending office actions. This suggests that the company's prosecution is not concentrated under any single primary reviewer, as each examiner handles 1 case.

The 3 distinct art units involved indicate that while the technology area is Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems, the specific technical focuses are varied. Practitioners should note that the 1 pending action under MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT is part of a broader set of 4 pending office actions across the portfolio. Strategy must be coordinated across the 3 distinct art units and 4 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (25%)
§101 + other2 (50%)
§103 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 1 24.8% +25.0%
AFRIN, NAZIA 1 34.4% +19.8%
TROOST, AARON L 1 74.9% +10.5%
NGUYEN, TRI T 1 67.5% +15.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18939612 DETERMINING PERSONALIZED DRIVER RISK MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT —
18071176 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING RIDESHARING BEHAVIOR TROOST, AARON L —
16375170 VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON TELEMATICS DATA NGUYEN, TRI T —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18939612 DETERMINING PERSONALIZED DRIVER RISK MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT —
18902327 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR USING CURRENT AND HISTORICAL DRIVING DATA TO DETECT CRASHES AFRIN, NAZIA —
18071176 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING RIDESHARING BEHAVIOR TROOST, AARON L —
16375170 VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON TELEMATICS DATA NGUYEN, TRI T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3666 2
3626 1
2128 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18939612 DETERMINING PERSONALIZED DRIVER RISK MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 3626 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 07, 2024
18902327 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR USING CURRENT AND HISTORICAL DRIVING DATA TO DETECT CRASHES AFRIN, NAZIA 3666 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18071176 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING RIDESHARING BEHAVIOR TROOST, AARON L 3666 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 29, 2022
16375170 VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON TELEMATICS DATA NGUYEN, TRI T 2128 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 04, 2019

Managing Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. have?

Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. applications?

Michael Corbett Moroney has the most, with 1 of Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month