Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Camx Power LLC currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a narrow but divided focus for its current prosecution efforts. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company is navigating different regulatory or technical standards even within the broader Chemistry & Materials field.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MARTIN, ANGELA J, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the total of 2 pending office actions is split among 2 distinct examiners, the workload is decentralized. This distribution means that no single examiner has a majority of the pending cases, which may require the applicant to maintain consistent arguments across the distinct art units to ensure portfolio harmony. The 1 busiest examiner pending action represents a specific portion of the total pending workload, highlighting a distribution of examiner attention across the distinct examiners currently engaged with the portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTIN, ANGELA J | 1 | 67.3% | -31.5% |
| KYLE, MADISON LEIGH | 1 | 60.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18388706 | PRE-LITHIATED ELECTRODE MATERIALS AND CELLS EMPLOYING THE SAME | MARTIN, ANGELA J | 17d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1727 | 1 |
| 1722 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18388706 | PRE-LITHIATED ELECTRODE MATERIALS AND CELLS EMPLOYING THE SAME | MARTIN, ANGELA J | 1727 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Nov 10, 2023 |
| 17693669 | FAULT TOLERANT BATTERY ARCHITECTURE | KYLE, MADISON LEIGH | 1722 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 14, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial