Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Capsol Technologies Asa currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DIETERLE, JENNIFER M, who is also identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This concentration of work suggests a focused prosecution effort where a single individual oversees the entirety of the company's current interactions with the patent office. The examiner, DIETERLE, JENNIFER M, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action, which represents the total volume of the company's current patent office activity.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the portfolio's technical scope is currently confined to a specific technological niche. With 1 pending office action under the review of DIETERLE, JENNIFER M, the practitioner can expect a consistent examination style across the current docket. This alignment between the busiest examiner and the total pending office actions allows for a direct management of deadlines and examiner interviews for this specific portfolio. Because the portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the tracking of examiner-specific trends is restricted to the data associated with these single entities.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 1 | 66.1% | +27.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18571899 | HEAT RECOVERY IN A CO2 CAPTURE PLANT | DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 16d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18571899 | HEAT RECOVERY IN A CO2 CAPTURE PLANT | DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 16d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1776 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18571899 | HEAT RECOVERY IN A CO2 CAPTURE PLANT | DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 1776 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 16d overdue | Pending | Dec 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial