Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Carbonwave Inc.

2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Carbonwave Inc. has 2 pending office actions currently active. These matters are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, including JOEL LAMPRECHT, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The data indicates 0 distinct art units for this portfolio. With 2 pending actions and 2 examiners, the company must manage different individual perspectives to advance its patent applications.

This distribution suggests that each case is being treated as a unique matter without a shared technical group assignment. Practitioners should coordinate between the 2 examiners to find common ground, despite the 0 art units listed. The presence of 1 pending action per examiner means that neither individual is overloaded with the company's current work. Success will depend on addressing the specific requirements of each examiner independently.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Double-patenting only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAMPRECHT, JOEL 1 81.4% +16.8%
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 1 80.8% +8.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19182956 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER TREATMENT OF CELLULITE LAMPRECHT, JOEL —
19077679 OPTIC ELEMENT FOR LASER TREATMENT OF A DERMATOLOGIC CONDITION DIETRICH, JOSEPH M —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19182956 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER TREATMENT OF CELLULITE LAMPRECHT, JOEL —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19182956 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER TREATMENT OF CELLULITE LAMPRECHT, JOEL — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
19077679 OPTIC ELEMENT FOR LASER TREATMENT OF A DERMATOLOGIC CONDITION DIETRICH, JOSEPH M — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 12, 2025

Managing Carbonwave Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month