Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Caret Holdings Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. Both examiners are located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated technical focus for the pending matters. This suggests that the company's software innovations are being evaluated by a single specialized group at the patent office, which could lead to consistent examination trends.
UDDIN, MOHAMMED R is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents 1 of the 2 total pending office actions for the company. The remaining action is handled by the other distinct examiner. With 2 distinct examiners in 1 distinct art unit, the company must manage 2 different personal examination styles while adhering to the same departmental standards. This focused prosecution profile is typical for companies with a specific technological niche. Practitioners should look for shared art unit precedents.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| UDDIN, MOHAMMED R | 1 | 78.0% | +30.0% |
| KHATIB, RAMI | 1 | 77.1% | +13.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19216314 | OBJECT-BASED SEARCH PROCESSING | UDDIN, MOHAMMED R | 41d |
| 19086882 | DATA FEATURES INTEGRATION PIPELINE | KHATIB, RAMI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19216314 | OBJECT-BASED SEARCH PROCESSING | UDDIN, MOHAMMED R | 41d |
| 19086882 | DATA FEATURES INTEGRATION PIPELINE | KHATIB, RAMI | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2161 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19216314 | OBJECT-BASED SEARCH PROCESSING | UDDIN, MOHAMMED R | 2161 | §101DP | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | May 22, 2025 |
| 19086882 | DATA FEATURES INTEGRATION PIPELINE | KHATIB, RAMI | — | §101§102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 21, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial