Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cc Biotechnology Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cc Biotechnology Corporation has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. This matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner, DARB, HAMZA A., who is the busiest examiner for the company. The portfolio's current activity is limited to a distinct art unit. This distribution suggests a narrow prosecution front, as the entirety of the pending workload is managed by the assigned examiner in a specific art unit.

For the practitioner, this concentration means that the outcome of the current pending portfolio rests on the interaction with the assigned examiner. Without other pending actions or art units to provide context, the strategy must be tailored to the specific feedback received in this case. The busiest examiner's workload of 1 pending action matches the total portfolio volume, confirming that all current efforts are focused on this single matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DARB, HAMZA A. 1 74.4% +30.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18742967 DRIVING PISTON SET OF AN INJECTOR AND CONVERSION MECHANISM HAVING THE SAME DARB, HAMZA A. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18742967 DRIVING PISTON SET OF AN INJECTOR AND CONVERSION MECHANISM HAVING THE SAME DARB, HAMZA A. 3783 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 13, 2024

Managing Cc Biotechnology Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month