Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Ce Cell Engineering GmbH

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ce Cell Engineering GmbH is managing 3 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. Each of these actions is assigned to a different individual, as shown by the 3 distinct examiners involved in the prosecution. This relationship between actions and examiners suggests that the company's semiconductor or optical innovations are being viewed as distinct technical challenges. The workload is further diversified across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the applications span several different specialized divisions.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is HENRY, CALEB E, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With a total of 3 pending office actions, the workload is distributed, and no single examiner has a dominant role. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy must be tailored to 3 different examiners across 3 distinct art units. This lack of concentration reduces the impact of any single examiner's decision on the overall portfolio. The presence of 3 distinct art units suggests that the company's technology in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area is multifaceted and requires navigation of various procedural environments.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
67% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HENRY, CALEB E 1 86.9% +6.0%
AYAD, TAMIR 1 42.3% +48.1%
JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER A 1 84.5% +8.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18581681 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE OHMIC CONTACT BETWEEN A FRONT SIDE CONTACT AND A DOPED LAYER OF A WAFER SOLAR CELL HENRY, CALEB E —
18581071 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE OHMIC CONTACT BETWEEN A FRONT CONTACT GRID AND A DOPED LAYER OF A WAFER SOLAR CELL JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER A —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18581984 METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE OHMIC CONTACT BETWEEN A FRONT CONTACT GRID AND A DOPED LAYER OF A WAFER SOLAR CELL AYAD, TAMIR —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18581984 METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE OHMIC CONTACT BETWEEN A FRONT CONTACT GRID AND A DOPED LAYER OF A WAFER SOLAR CELL AYAD, TAMIR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2818 1
1726 1
2899 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18581681 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE OHMIC CONTACT BETWEEN A FRONT SIDE CONTACT AND A DOPED LAYER OF A WAFER SOLAR CELL HENRY, CALEB E 2818 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 20, 2024
18581984 METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE OHMIC CONTACT BETWEEN A FRONT CONTACT GRID AND A DOPED LAYER OF A WAFER SOLAR CELL AYAD, TAMIR 1726 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 20, 2024
18581071 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE OHMIC CONTACT BETWEEN A FRONT CONTACT GRID AND A DOPED LAYER OF A WAFER SOLAR CELL JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER A 2899 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 19, 2024

Managing Ce Cell Engineering GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ce Cell Engineering GmbH have?

Ce Cell Engineering GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ce Cell Engineering GmbH applications?

Caleb E Henry has the most, with 1 of Ce Cell Engineering GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Ce Cell Engineering GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month