Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Celgene Corporation

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

12 pending office actions • 9 art units • 12 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Celgene Corporation has 10 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 10 actions are handled by 10 distinct examiners, resulting in a unique examiner for every pending case. The portfolio is distributed across 8 distinct art units, which indicates that the 10 distinct examiners are spread across 8 different technical divisions within the USPTO.

The busiest examiner is DAVIS, BRIAN J, who has 1 pending office action. This 1 action represents a portion of the 10 total pending office actions for the company. With 10 distinct examiners and 8 distinct art units, the applicant faces multiple variables in its prosecution landscape. Practitioners must manage 10 different examiner styles across 8 different art units, requiring a strategy that addresses the specific technical standards of each group. The count of 8 art units relative to the 10 pending actions suggests that the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals subject matter is technically varied.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (8%)
6
Medium (50%)
5
Easy (42%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (17%)
§112 only2 (17%)
Double-patenting only3 (25%)
Double-patenting + other4 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (8%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1 55.4% +46.2%
DAVIS, BRIAN J 1 84.8% -4.0%
WARD, PAUL V 1 83.2% -12.2%
CORNET, JEAN P 1 42.1% +47.5%
WILSON, MICHAEL C 1 41.5% +17.9%
PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1 69.1% +18.6%
RAHMANI, NILOOFAR 1 77.5% -2.9%
BELL, SARA ELIZABETH 1 68.8% +38.2%
METCALF, MATTHEW CURRAN 1 37.5% +71.4%
SHUPE, ELIZABETH A 1 66.2% +44.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18776606 CEREBLON BINDING COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT THEREWITH DAVIS, BRIAN J —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18763757 METHODS FOR TREATING SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND THE USE OF BIOMARKERS AS A PREDICTOR OF CLINICAL SENSITIVITY TO THERAPIES WARD, PAUL V —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18800988 ORAL FORMULATIONS OF CYTIDINE ANALOGS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V —
18714760 Carboxylic Acid Containing Indanyl Compounds for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases CORNET, JEAN P —
18609867 TRANSGENIC MOUSE EXPRESSING HUMAN CEREBLON WILSON, MICHAEL C —
18427510 COMBINATION THERAPIES USING AN ANTI-BCMA ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATE (ADC) IN COMBINATION WITH A GAMMA SECRETASE INHIBITOR (GSI) PUTTLITZ, KARL J —
18573790 CEREBLON BINDING COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT THEREWITH BELL, SARA ELIZABETH —
18563037 METHODS OF TREATING MULTIPLE MYELOMA USING COMBINATION THERAPY METCALF, MATTHEW CURRAN —
17795829 ANTI-CD30 ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AND THEIR USE FOR THE TREATMENT OF NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA SHUPE, ELIZABETH A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1615 1
1614 1
1638 1
1642 1
1691 1
1625 1
1643 1
1627 1
1693 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18800988 ORAL FORMULATIONS OF CYTIDINE ANALOGS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1615 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2024
18776606 CEREBLON BINDING COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT THEREWITH DAVIS, BRIAN J 1614 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2024
18763757 METHODS FOR TREATING SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND THE USE OF BIOMARKERS AS A PREDICTOR OF CLINICAL SENSITIVITY TO THERAPIES WARD, PAUL V — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2024
18714760 Carboxylic Acid Containing Indanyl Compounds for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases CORNET, JEAN P — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2024
18609867 TRANSGENIC MOUSE EXPRESSING HUMAN CEREBLON WILSON, MICHAEL C 1638 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 19, 2024
18427510 COMBINATION THERAPIES USING AN ANTI-BCMA ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATE (ADC) IN COMBINATION WITH A GAMMA SECRETASE INHIBITOR (GSI) PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1642 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 30, 2024
18419894 ANTIPROLIFERATIVE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF RAHMANI, NILOOFAR 1691 DP Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 23, 2024
18573790 CEREBLON BINDING COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT THEREWITH BELL, SARA ELIZABETH 1625 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 22, 2023
18563037 METHODS OF TREATING MULTIPLE MYELOMA USING COMBINATION THERAPY METCALF, MATTHEW CURRAN — §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2023
17795829 ANTI-CD30 ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AND THEIR USE FOR THE TREATMENT OF NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA SHUPE, ELIZABETH A 1643 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 27, 2022
17867294 ARYLMETHOXY ISOINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME NESTOR, DONNA MICHELLE 1627 DP Non-Final OA 73d overdue Pending Jul 18, 2022
17620541 AZACITIDINE IN COMBINATION WITH VENETOCLAX, GILTERITINIB, MIDOSTAURIN OR OTHER COMPOUNDS FOR TREATING LEUKEMIA OR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME BERRY, LAYLA D 1693 §103DP Non-Final OA 48d Pending Dec 17, 2021

Managing Celgene Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month