Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cellcentric GmbH & Co. Kg

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cellcentric GmbH & Co. Kg is currently managing 5 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 5 pending office actions are distributed among 5 distinct examiners, which means that every active application is being reviewed by a different individual at the patent office. The data also indicates that the prosecution is occurring across 4 distinct art units, showing some technical variety within the company's chemistry-related filings.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is HAMMOND, KRISHNA R, who is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending office action is a part of the 5 pending office actions total, reflecting an even distribution of work across the 5 distinct examiners. This lack of concentration suggests that the company's success is not tied to the discretion of any individual examiner.

Practitioners should note that the involvement of 4 distinct art units may lead to different procedural experiences for each application. Because HAMMOND, KRISHNA R only manages 1 busiest examiner pending office action, the company must maintain a prosecution strategy that addresses the specific requirements of all examiners. Coordinating responses across these different examiners and art units is key to managing the Chemistry & Materials portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAMMOND, KRISHNA R 1 62.0% +14.9%
CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN 1 38.4% +36.2%
ALEJANDRO, RAYMOND 1 79.2% +22.2%
GATEWOOD, DANIEL S 1 77.9% +18.8%
BEHA, CAROLINE 1 57.5% +23.8%

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17764674 A METHOD FOR BONDING COMPONENTS OF A FUEL CELL BEHA, CAROLINE 42d overdue
18261208 CONVEYING APPARATUS FOR MEDIA HAMMOND, KRISHNA R 10d overdue
18254542 ANODE CIRCUIT CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN 4d overdue
18042805 FUEL CELL STACK ALEJANDRO, RAYMOND 28d
18042377 FLOW FIELD PLATE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME GATEWOOD, DANIEL S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1725 2
1752 1
1729 1
1748 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18261208 CONVEYING APPARATUS FOR MEDIA HAMMOND, KRISHNA R 1725 §103 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2023
18254542 ANODE CIRCUIT CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN 1725 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending May 25, 2023
18042805 FUEL CELL STACK ALEJANDRO, RAYMOND 1752 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Feb 24, 2023
18042377 FLOW FIELD PLATE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME GATEWOOD, DANIEL S 1729 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 21, 2023
17764674 A METHOD FOR BONDING COMPONENTS OF A FUEL CELL BEHA, CAROLINE 1748 §103 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Mar 29, 2022

Managing Cellcentric GmbH & Co. Kg's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month