Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Central Glass Co. Ltd. holds a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. There are 2 pending office actions currently being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that each examiner is managing 1 pending action for the company. The prosecution is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, despite having 2 distinct examiners assigned to the portfolio.
ZENG, LINGWEN R is the busiest examiner, currently handling 1 pending office action. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the 2 pending office actions involve closely related technical subject matter within the chemistry sector. With 2 pending office actions total, the workload is distributed such that each of the 2 distinct examiners is assigned to 1 pending office action. This structure allows for a consistent technical review environment even as the workload is shared between 2 distinct examiners within the 1 distinct art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZENG, LINGWEN R | 1 | 76.6% | +20.3% |
| MENDOZA, KENT GREGORY | 1 | — | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18573706 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION, NONAQUEOUS SODIUM ION BATTERY, NONAQUEOUS POTASSIUM ION BATTERY, METHOD FOR PRODUCING NONAQUEOUS SODIUM ION BATTERY, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING NONAQUEOUS POTASSIUM ION BATTERY | ZENG, LINGWEN R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18573706 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION, NONAQUEOUS SODIUM ION BATTERY, NONAQUEOUS POTASSIUM ION BATTERY, METHOD FOR PRODUCING NONAQUEOUS SODIUM ION BATTERY, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING NONAQUEOUS POTASSIUM ION BATTERY | ZENG, LINGWEN R | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 22, 2023 |
| 18553153 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION, NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION BATTERY, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION BATTERY | MENDOZA, KENT GREGORY | 1754 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial