Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Ceres Intellectual Property Company Limited

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ceres Intellectual Property Company Limited is managing 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, reflecting a diversified approach to its current patent prosecution. This distribution suggests that the company's work in Chemistry & Materials touches upon different specialized technical fields.

The busiest examiner for the company is HOPKINS, ROBERT A, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 3 pending office actions divided among 3 distinct examiners, each examiner is currently reviewing exactly 1 case. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that the workload is evenly distributed across the 3 distinct examiners and the 2 distinct art units involved.

For a patent practitioner, this data indicates that Ceres Intellectual Property Company Limited must coordinate its prosecution across 2 distinct art units. Although there are 3 pending office actions, the involvement of 3 distinct examiners means that each application is subject to an independent review process. This requires maintaining consistent arguments across the different examiners within the Chemistry & Materials sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
2
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROSENBAUM, AMANDA R 2 58.8% +12.5%
HOPKINS, ROBERT A 1 84.5% +7.5%
EFYMOW, JESSE JAMES 1 87.0% +37.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18841041 ASU Electrolyser System HOPKINS, ROBERT A —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18036139 SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND STEAM GENERATOR THEREOF EFYMOW, JESSE JAMES 28d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18036139 SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND STEAM GENERATOR THEREOF EFYMOW, JESSE JAMES 28d overdue
17759263 INTERLAYER FOR SOLID OXIDE CELL ROSENBAUM, AMANDA R 33d
17770998 METAL-SUPPORTED CELL UNIT ROSENBAUM, AMANDA R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1752 2
1723 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18841041 ASU Electrolyser System HOPKINS, ROBERT A — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18036139 SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND STEAM GENERATOR THEREOF EFYMOW, JESSE JAMES 1723 §102§103 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending May 09, 2023
17759263 INTERLAYER FOR SOLID OXIDE CELL ROSENBAUM, AMANDA R 1752 §103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Jul 21, 2022
17770998 METAL-SUPPORTED CELL UNIT ROSENBAUM, AMANDA R 1752 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 21, 2022

Managing Ceres Intellectual Property Company Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month