Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials
17 pending office actions • 9 art units • 15 examiners • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ch Biotech R&D Co. Ltd. manages 14 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed among 12 distinct examiners, showing that the company interacts with a wide variety of personnel at the USPTO. This distribution helps mitigate the risk associated with any single examiner's specific interpretation of patent law.
The portfolio spans 8 distinct art units, indicating that the 14 pending office actions involve several different specialized technical fields. LANGEL, WAYNE A is the busiest examiner for the company, currently holding 2 pending office actions. This means that the vast majority of the 12 distinct examiners are only handling one case each for the company.
Because there are 12 distinct examiners for 14 pending office actions, the company's prosecution results are likely to be varied. The 8 distinct art units suggest a complex prosecution landscape that requires navigating multiple different supervisory chains within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals area. This level of diversity in art units and examiners requires a versatile approach to responding to office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (6%) |
| §112 only | 5 (29%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (6%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 6 (35%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 4 (24%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANGEL, WAYNE A | 2 | 78.4% | +23.2% |
| BARBER, KIMBERLY | 2 | 73.6% | +18.5% |
| CELSA, BENNETT M | 1 | 33.3% | +0.0% |
| EVANS, JASMINE AFIYA | 1 | — | — |
| GULLEDGE, BRIAN M | 1 | 55.8% | +26.1% |
| JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE | 1 | 15.9% | +63.6% |
| ROSSI, JULIA ANNE LORRAIN | 1 | 45.7% | +61.3% |
| FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M | 1 | 45.7% | +35.3% |
| MATTHEWS, JOSEPH RICCI | 1 | — | — |
| CONIGLIO, AUDREA JUNE BUCKLEY | 1 | 52.9% | +21.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18645293 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO INCREASE PRODUCTION YIELD OF LETTUCE | JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE | — |
| 18642445 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION IN CONTROLLING FUSARIUM WILT IN ASPARAGUS BEAN | MATTHEWS, JOSEPH RICCI | — |
| 18409792 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COTTON SEEDLING | BARBER, KIMBERLY | — |
| 18531687 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION UPON COFFEE PLANTS TO INCREASE FRUITING YIELD AND WEIGHT | ESPINOSA, CLAUDIA EDILMA | — |
| 18119941 | COMPOSITION FOR ENHANCING NITROGEN ASSIMILATION IN PLANTS | SAEED, ALI S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18428193 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO ENHANCE PRODUCTION YIELD OF TOMATO FRUITS UNDER HOT WEATHER CONDITION | CONIGLIO, AUDREA JUNE BUCKLEY | 77d |
| 18656153 | Method Of Using/Applying A Keratin Hydrolysis Peptide Solution To Promote The Growth Of Tomato Under Low Light Condition | GULLEDGE, BRIAN M | — |
| 18645293 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO INCREASE PRODUCTION YIELD OF LETTUCE | JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE | — |
| 18642007 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO IMPROVE THE DROUGHT STRESS TOLERANCE OF CORN | ROSSI, JULIA ANNE LORRAIN | — |
| 18642487 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE GROWTH OF COTTON UNDER LOW LIGHT CONDITION | FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M | — |
| 18418259 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO IMPROVE THE FERTILIZER USAGE EFFICIENCY IN CORN | LANGEL, WAYNE A | — |
| 18409792 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COTTON SEEDLING | BARBER, KIMBERLY | — |
| 18408257 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO ENHANCE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE ATTRIBUTE OF WHEAT PLANTS | LANGEL, WAYNE A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1793 | 4 |
| 1616 | 1 |
| 1613 | 1 |
| 1615 | 1 |
| 1652 | 1 |
| 1617 | 1 |
| 1658 | 1 |
| 1654 | 1 |
| 1600 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18671837 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE THE GROWTH OF WHEAT UNDER LOW TEMPERATURE CONDITION | CELSA, BENNETT M | — | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 22, 2024 |
| 18658834 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE THE GROWTH OF SOYBEANS UNDER LOW TEMPERATURE CONDITION | EVANS, JASMINE AFIYA | 1616 | §112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 08, 2024 |
| 18656153 | Method Of Using/Applying A Keratin Hydrolysis Peptide Solution To Promote The Growth Of Tomato Under Low Light Condition | GULLEDGE, BRIAN M | — | §112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 06, 2024 |
| 18645293 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO INCREASE PRODUCTION YIELD OF LETTUCE | JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE | 1613 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
| 18642007 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO IMPROVE THE DROUGHT STRESS TOLERANCE OF CORN | ROSSI, JULIA ANNE LORRAIN | 1615 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18642487 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE GROWTH OF COTTON UNDER LOW LIGHT CONDITION | FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M | 1652 | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18642445 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION IN CONTROLLING FUSARIUM WILT IN ASPARAGUS BEAN | MATTHEWS, JOSEPH RICCI | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18428193 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO ENHANCE PRODUCTION YIELD OF TOMATO FRUITS UNDER HOT WEATHER CONDITION | CONIGLIO, AUDREA JUNE BUCKLEY | 1617 | §112DP | Non-Final OA | 77d | Pending | Jan 31, 2024 |
| 18418259 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO IMPROVE THE FERTILIZER USAGE EFFICIENCY IN CORN | LANGEL, WAYNE A | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 20, 2024 |
| 18412615 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO IMPROVE THE FERTILIZER USAGE EFFICIENCY IN WHEAT PLANTS | PAK, JOHN D | 1793 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 15, 2024 |
| 18412611 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF CORN CROPS | BABSON, NICOLE PLOURDE | — | §112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 15, 2024 |
| 18409792 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO PROMOTE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COTTON SEEDLING | BARBER, KIMBERLY | 1793 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 11, 2024 |
| 18408257 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION TO ENHANCE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE ATTRIBUTE OF WHEAT PLANTS | LANGEL, WAYNE A | 1658 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 09, 2024 |
| 18537395 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION UPON COTTON TO ENHANCE DROUGHT-TOLERANCE | GEMBEH, SHIRLEY V | 1793 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 12, 2023 |
| 18534628 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION UPON GRAPE PLANTS TO INCREASE PRODUCTION YIELD | BARBER, KIMBERLY | 1793 | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 09, 2023 |
| 18531687 | METHOD OF USING/APPLYING A KERATIN HYDROLYSIS PEPTIDE SOLUTION UPON COFFEE PLANTS TO INCREASE FRUITING YIELD AND WEIGHT | ESPINOSA, CLAUDIA EDILMA | 1654 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 07, 2023 |
| 18119941 | COMPOSITION FOR ENHANCING NITROGEN ASSIMILATION IN PLANTS | SAEED, ALI S | 1600 | §103§112Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial