Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Chia-Shing Liu is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, showing a narrow focus for the active portfolio. By operating within a specific art unit, the applicant is engaging with a set of technical standards and examination practices tailored to medical and mechanical innovations. This concentration suggests a targeted investment in a particular technological solution rather than a broad-based patenting strategy.
EISEMAN, ADAM JARED is the busiest examiner, responsible for the pending office action. Because all pending work is concentrated with a lone examiner in a specific art unit, the prosecution strategy is highly dependent on the individual's interpretation of medical and mechanical engineering standards. The resolution of this pending office action will be the primary determinant of the portfolio's current progress, as there are no other distinct examiners or art units involved to diversify the prosecution risk or provide comparative data on examiner behavior.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EISEMAN, ADAM JARED | 1 | 55.1% | +27.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18648716 | BONE-CONDUCTION TRANSCRANIAL CEREBRAL PRESSURE MONITORING DEVICE AND BONE-CONDUCTION TRANSCRANIAL CEREBRAL PRESSURE MONITORING MODULE | EISEMAN, ADAM JARED | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18648716 | BONE-CONDUCTION TRANSCRANIAL CEREBRAL PRESSURE MONITORING DEVICE AND BONE-CONDUCTION TRANSCRANIAL CEREBRAL PRESSURE MONITORING MODULE | EISEMAN, ADAM JARED | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18648716 | BONE-CONDUCTION TRANSCRANIAL CEREBRAL PRESSURE MONITORING DEVICE AND BONE-CONDUCTION TRANSCRANIAL CEREBRAL PRESSURE MONITORING MODULE | EISEMAN, ADAM JARED | 3791 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 29d | Pending | Apr 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial