Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Children’S Healthcare Of Atlanta Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This case is being reviewed by PHILIP EARL STIMPERT, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The activity is confined to a distinct art unit, indicating a specialized focus for their medical technology interests. With only a distinct examiner and art unit involved, the prosecution strategy can be highly targeted.

The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current active portfolio. Because PHILIP EARL STIMPERT is the only examiner handling their work, the relationship with this individual is critical for their patent goals. The concentration in a distinct art unit allows the legal team to focus on the specific trends and rules of that section. Successfully navigating this pending office action will be the key to the company's immediate success in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Practitioners should monitor the examiner's specific preferences to optimize the outcome of this filing.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BURKHART, MICHAEL D 1 62.3% +11.7%
STEIN, LEAH ELIZABETH 1 100.0% +0.0%
BUNKER, AMY M 1 29.1% +45.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18271364 Interleukin-37, Chimeric Antigen Receptors, Nucleic Acids, and Vectors Encoding the Same and Uses in Cancer Therapies STEIN, LEAH ELIZABETH —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17919481 Immune Cell Redirecting Compositions and Therapeutic Uses Thereof BUNKER, AMY M 30d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17919481 Immune Cell Redirecting Compositions and Therapeutic Uses Thereof BUNKER, AMY M 30d
18654622 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED DRUG RESISTANT T CELLS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME BURKHART, MICHAEL D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1641 1
1684 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18654622 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED DRUG RESISTANT T CELLS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME BURKHART, MICHAEL D — §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 03, 2024
18271364 Interleukin-37, Chimeric Antigen Receptors, Nucleic Acids, and Vectors Encoding the Same and Uses in Cancer Therapies STEIN, LEAH ELIZABETH 1641 §103§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Jul 07, 2023
17919481 Immune Cell Redirecting Compositions and Therapeutic Uses Thereof BUNKER, AMY M 1684 §103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Oct 17, 2022

Managing Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month