Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Classic Brands LLC is overseeing 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This indicates a diversified approach to its current patent filings.
The busiest examiner, TOPOLSKI, MAGDALENA, is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners each managing 1 of the 2 pending office actions, the company must navigate 2 separate prosecution tracks simultaneously. This requires the company to adapt to different examination styles across its portfolio.
The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the 2 pending office actions cover different technical aspects within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Managing 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units adds a layer of complexity to the company's patent strategy. This distribution ensures that the company's intellectual property efforts are not concentrated on a single point of contact.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOPOLSKI, MAGDALENA | 1 | 56.5% | +41.0% |
| NGUYEN, TRINH T | 1 | 69.0% | +27.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18676972 | BIRD FEEDER HANGER ASSEMBLY | TOPOLSKI, MAGDALENA | 11d overdue |
| 18650425 | SMALL SEED CONVERTER FOR BIRD FEEDER | NGUYEN, TRINH T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| 3644 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18676972 | BIRD FEEDER HANGER ASSEMBLY | TOPOLSKI, MAGDALENA | 3642 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 11d overdue | Pending | May 29, 2024 |
| 18650425 | SMALL SEED CONVERTER FOR BIRD FEEDER | NGUYEN, TRINH T | 3644 | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial