Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cockroach Labs Inc. is currently navigating 2 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, showing a diversified prosecution landscape. This spread suggests that the company's software innovations are being evaluated across different specialized groups within the patent office.
FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Although the total volume is 2 pending office actions, the involvement of 2 distinct art units requires the company to adapt to different procedural nuances. The 1 busiest examiner pending office action represents a specific portion of the company's current active prosecution workload.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R | 1 | 64.3% | +37.3% |
| ADAMS, CHARLES D | 1 | 44.9% | +43.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18504790 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR NON-BLOCKING TRANSACTIONS | FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R | 367d overdue |
| 18316851 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSACTION COMMIT AND LOCK RELEASE ATOP PARTITIONED CONSENSUS | ADAMS, CHARLES D | 84d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2153 | 1 |
| 2152 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18504790 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR NON-BLOCKING TRANSACTIONS | FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R | 2153 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | 367d overdue | Pending | Nov 08, 2023 |
| 18316851 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSACTION COMMIT AND LOCK RELEASE ATOP PARTITIONED CONSENSUS | ADAMS, CHARLES D | 2152 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 84d | Pending | May 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial