Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Conextivity Group SA has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This activity involves 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, showing a focused approach to its current patent applications. This concentration suggests that the company is currently advancing a specific innovation within the semiconductor or optics fields.
BAILLARGEON, PAUL D is the busiest examiner, responsible for the pending office action. As this examiner manages the entirety of the company's pending matters, the immediate prosecution path is defined by the interactions with this single individual. Practitioners should review the examiner's previous work in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area to tailor their arguments for the pending office action. The resolution of this matter will be the key factor in the company's short-term intellectual property development.
The involvement of a single distinct art unit indicates that the company's technology is being reviewed within a specific technical framework. While this reduces the complexity of managing multiple applications, it also means the company's current patenting success is tied to a single point of review. The outcome of the pending office action will be the primary indicator of the company's success in securing patent protection during this period. Success in this environment requires a deep understanding of the technical standards applied by this specific art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAILLARGEON, PAUL D | 1 | 77.6% | +4.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18019759 | CONNECTOR FOR RF TRANSMISSION | BAILLARGEON, PAUL D | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2831 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18019759 | CONNECTOR FOR RF TRANSMISSION | BAILLARGEON, PAUL D | 2831 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Feb 03, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial