Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Continental Automotive GmbH

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Continental Automotive GmbH currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These matters are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units indicates a diverse set of active cases within the software sector, with no concentration in any single administrative group.

PHAM, JESSICA THUY is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action. With a busiest examiner pending count of 1 and a total of 3 pending actions, the workload is evenly distributed among the assigned examiners. This lack of concentration suggests that the company's current prosecution strategy involves multiple distinct technological paths or examiner interactions. For practitioners, this distribution means that the portfolio's overall success is not dependent on any single examiner's individual tendencies.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PHAM, JESSICA THUY 1 18.2% +90.0%
ALKIRSH, AHMED 1 47.7% +32.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17756461 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING TASK COMPATIBILITY IN NEURAL NETWORKS PHAM, JESSICA THUY 7d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17457568 SPIKE BARRIER DETECTION VEHICULAR SYSTEM AND METHOD ALKIRSH, AHMED 66d overdue
17756461 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING TASK COMPATIBILITY IN NEURAL NETWORKS PHAM, JESSICA THUY 7d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2121 1
3668 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17756461 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING TASK COMPATIBILITY IN NEURAL NETWORKS PHAM, JESSICA THUY 2121 §103§112 Final Rejection 7d Pending May 25, 2022
17457568 SPIKE BARRIER DETECTION VEHICULAR SYSTEM AND METHOD ALKIRSH, AHMED 3668 §112 Non-Final OA 66d overdue Pending Dec 03, 2021

Managing Continental Automotive GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Continental Automotive GmbH have?

Continental Automotive GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Continental Automotive GmbH applications?

Jessica Thuy Pham has the most, with 1 of Continental Automotive GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Continental Automotive GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month