Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Continental Automotive GmbH

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Continental Automotive GmbH operates in the Computing & Software technology area. The organization currently has 2 pending office actions. This workload is distributed across 2 distinct art units, suggesting a broad technical scope for the current filings. This distribution indicates a strategic emphasis on multiple technical niches within the Computing & Software sector. The company's patenting activity is currently spread across these different areas of development.

The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners. PHAM, JESSICA THUY is the busiest examiner, handling 1 pending office action. This alignment shows how the patent office has assigned the company's current applications. The use of 2 distinct examiners suggests a diversified review process where communication is split between different officials. This structure increases the complexity of portfolio management but provides multiple points of contact.

For practitioners, the presence of 2 pending office actions in 2 distinct art units means the prosecution path is varied. Since PHAM, JESSICA THUY handles 1 pending office action, the outcome for that specific matter depends on this individual's interpretation of the claims. This profile reflects an intellectual property strategy that relies on navigating the requirements and preferences of multiple assigned examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PHAM, JESSICA THUY 1 18.2% +90.0%
TORRES RUIZ, JOHALI ALEJANDRA 1 54.4% +23.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17756461 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING TASK COMPATIBILITY IN NEURAL NETWORKS PHAM, JESSICA THUY 7d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17756461 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING TASK COMPATIBILITY IN NEURAL NETWORKS PHAM, JESSICA THUY 7d
17437595 METHOD FOR CHARGING BY INDUCTION AND ASSOCIATED CHARGING DEVICE TORRES RUIZ, JOHALI ALEJANDRA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2121 1
2859 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17756461 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING TASK COMPATIBILITY IN NEURAL NETWORKS PHAM, JESSICA THUY 2121 §103§112 Final Rejection 7d Pending May 25, 2022
17437595 METHOD FOR CHARGING BY INDUCTION AND ASSOCIATED CHARGING DEVICE TORRES RUIZ, JOHALI ALEJANDRA 2859 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2021

Managing Continental Automotive GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month