Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
| §102 only | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHARMA, YASHITA | 2 | 82.2% | +26.2% |
| SIPP, AMY R. | 1 | 70.5% | +26.4% |
| HU, ANN M | 1 | 67.7% | +21.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18251769 | Modular Augment | SHARMA, YASHITA | 25d overdue |
| 18258381 | Femoral Stem Design Method | SHARMA, YASHITA | 2d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18256500 | Augment Implant to which Different Types of Porous Structures are Applied | HU, ANN M | 80d overdue |
| 18688599 | Acetabular Cup Impactor, Anteversion Guide, and Surgical Instrument | SIPP, AMY R. | 36d overdue |
| 18251769 | Modular Augment | SHARMA, YASHITA | 25d overdue |
| 18258381 | Femoral Stem Design Method | SHARMA, YASHITA | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3774 | 3 |
| 3775 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18688599 | Acetabular Cup Impactor, Anteversion Guide, and Surgical Instrument | SIPP, AMY R. | 3775 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 36d overdue | Pending | Mar 01, 2024 |
| 18258381 | Femoral Stem Design Method | SHARMA, YASHITA | 3774 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Jun 20, 2023 |
| 18256500 | Augment Implant to which Different Types of Porous Structures are Applied | HU, ANN M | 3774 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 80d overdue | Pending | Jun 08, 2023 |
| 18251769 | Modular Augment | SHARMA, YASHITA | 3774 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 25d overdue | Pending | May 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial