Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Corryn Biotechnologies Limited currently maintains a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio is characterized by 1 pending office action, which constitutes the entirety of the company's current active prosecution. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a concentrated technical focus for the pending intellectual property.
The prosecution process involves 1 distinct examiner, ensuring a singular focus for the company's legal representatives. GREENLUND, JOSEPH A is the busiest examiner for Corryn Biotechnologies Limited, currently handling 1 pending office action. As the only examiner listed in the data, his individual review and interpretation of the patent claims will be the decisive factor in the current prosecution cycle.
With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the portfolio's current activity is straightforward from an administrative perspective. However, this also means that the company's immediate patent goals are tied to a single set of interactions. Practitioners should tailor their arguments to the specific style of GREENLUND, JOSEPH A and the standards of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area to move the 1 pending office action toward allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GREENLUND, JOSEPH A | 1 | 66.6% | +34.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18558459 | FLUID IONISING DEVICE | GREENLUND, JOSEPH A | 19d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18558459 | FLUID IONISING DEVICE | GREENLUND, JOSEPH A | 19d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3752 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18558459 | FLUID IONISING DEVICE | GREENLUND, JOSEPH A | 3752 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 19d overdue | Pending | Nov 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial