Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cosesy A/S is positioned within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's current patent prosecution activity consists of 1 pending office action. This 1 action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a concentrated effort on a specific piece of intellectual property. The prosecution is also limited to 1 distinct art unit, which indicates that the technology is focused within a particular mechanical or medical classification.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is LIEUWEN, CODY J, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the company has only 1 pending office action, this examiner is the 1 individual currently determining the progress of the company's active filings. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company has not yet expanded its pending claims into multiple technical fields. For the practitioner, the reliance on 1 distinct examiner means that the immediate success of the portfolio is tied to the specific examination patterns of 1 official at the USPTO.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIEUWEN, CODY J | 1 | 59.8% | +46.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18197975 | FIRE EXTINGUISHER, A SYSTEM FOR MONITORING A FIRE EXTINGUISHER, AND METHODS FOR DETECTING LEAKAGE FROM A FIRE EXTINGUISHER | LIEUWEN, CODY J | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3752 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18197975 | FIRE EXTINGUISHER, A SYSTEM FOR MONITORING A FIRE EXTINGUISHER, AND METHODS FOR DETECTING LEAKAGE FROM A FIRE EXTINGUISHER | LIEUWEN, CODY J | 3752 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d | Pending | May 16, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial