Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cre8Te Technology LLC has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This activity is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, representing a focused prosecution profile. The company's current efforts appear to be centered on a specific medical or mechanical innovation rather than a broad portfolio of diverse technologies.
TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI is the busiest examiner, holding the pending office action. Because this examiner manages the company's entire active workload, practitioners must tailor their approach to the specific examination style of this individual. The lack of other pending matters means that the company's immediate patenting goals are entirely dependent on the resolution of this single office action. Analyzing the examiner's historical rejection patterns will be essential for securing an allowance.
The presence of a single distinct art unit indicates that the company's technology is being reviewed by a specialized group. This concentration allows for a very specific legal strategy, but it also means the company is vulnerable to the specific interpretations and policies of that one unit. The pending office action serves as the sole focus for the company's current interactions with the patent office. Successful prosecution in this environment requires a deep understanding of the technical standards applied by this specific art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 1 | 39.0% | +46.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18164555 | SUITCASE HAVING ADDED USER FEATURES | TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 72d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18164555 | SUITCASE HAVING ADDED USER FEATURES | TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 72d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3733 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18164555 | SUITCASE HAVING ADDED USER FEATURES | TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 3733 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 72d overdue | Pending | Feb 03, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial