Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Crime Science Technology

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Crime Science Technology currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, concentrating the company's current prosecution efforts. This level of focus suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific chemical advancement in its active docket. The pending office action represents the current focus of the company's intellectual property development.

The busiest examiner for the company is GODENSCHWAGER, PETER F, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. The outcome of the company's active docket is subject to the individual examination practices of this official. Practitioners should evaluate the examiner's previous rulings in the Chemistry & Materials field to prepare effective responses. The success of the 1 pending office action will determine the company's immediate progress in securing patent rights. Navigating the requirements of this specific examiner is the most critical task for the company's current prosecution strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GODENSCHWAGER, PETER F 1 68.0% +17.7%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18009171 FLUORESCENT COMPOSITION COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE BENZAZOLE COMPOUND FOR THE SECUREMENT OF PRODUCTS GODENSCHWAGER, PETER F 9d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1767 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18009171 FLUORESCENT COMPOSITION COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE BENZAZOLE COMPOUND FOR THE SECUREMENT OF PRODUCTS GODENSCHWAGER, PETER F 1767 §103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Dec 08, 2022

Managing Crime Science Technology's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month