Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cross Innovations LLC is currently managing 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is being handled by a different individual. Despite the involvement of multiple examiners, all 3 pending actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a consistent technical focus for the company's current applications.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the workload is distributed with each examiner handling 1 pending office action. The fact that all 3 distinct examiners are within 1 distinct art unit may lead to some consistency in the examination process, as they likely share similar supervisory guidance. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 3 separate examiner relationships while navigating the specific standards of the 1 distinct art unit involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA | 1 | 56.4% | +59.5% |
| ORTIZ, ADAM C | 1 | 65.9% | +34.6% |
| MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE | 1 | 80.4% | +34.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19322460 | PRESSURE PAD COUPLING SYSTEM AND METHOD | GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA | — |
| 19306505 | BED RAIL LOCKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | ORTIZ, ADAM C | — |
| 19260759 | Bed Rail System | MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19322460 | PRESSURE PAD COUPLING SYSTEM AND METHOD | GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA | — |
| 19306505 | BED RAIL LOCKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | ORTIZ, ADAM C | — |
| 19260759 | Bed Rail System | MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3673 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19322460 | PRESSURE PAD COUPLING SYSTEM AND METHOD | GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA | 3673 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 08, 2025 |
| 19306505 | BED RAIL LOCKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | ORTIZ, ADAM C | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2025 |
| 19260759 | Bed Rail System | MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial