Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Cryo H&I Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Cryo H&I Inc. is currently navigating 6 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Despite having multiple active matters, all 6 actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a very specific technical niche for these applications. This concentration in 1 art unit implies that the company's innovations are being evaluated within a single specialized division of the USPTO.

The portfolio is reviewed by 5 distinct examiners, providing variety in the feedback received despite the single art unit designation. KING, BRIAN M is the busiest examiner for the company, currently managing 2 pending actions. While KING, BRIAN M handles a cluster of 2 actions, the remaining matters are spread among other examiners, ensuring that the workload is distributed among several officials.

The concentration of 6 actions in 1 art unit while utilizing 5 distinct examiners is a notable distribution. It suggests that while the technology is narrowly classified, the USPTO has assigned a relatively large team of officials to evaluate the company's specific mechanical innovations. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination culture of this single art unit while remaining adaptable to the individual preferences of the various examiners involved in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
1
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KING, BRIAN M 2 70.3% +23.7%
MENGESHA, WEBESHET 1 47.2% +12.7%
MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 1 48.4% +37.2%
ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M 1 69.7% +36.5%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19079590 CRYOPUMP SYSTEM KING, BRIAN M —
19073144 METHOD FOR REGENERATING CRYOPUMP KING, BRIAN M —
18944117 METHOD FOR VACUUM-EXHAUSTING BY MEANS OF CRYOPUMP MOORE, DEVON TYLEN —
18826608 EXHAUST GAS TREATMENTAPPARATUS ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19079590 CRYOPUMP SYSTEM KING, BRIAN M —
19073144 METHOD FOR REGENERATING CRYOPUMP KING, BRIAN M —
18951888 METHOD FOR REGENERATING CRYOPUMP MENGESHA, WEBESHET —
18944117 METHOD FOR VACUUM-EXHAUSTING BY MEANS OF CRYOPUMP MOORE, DEVON TYLEN —
18826608 EXHAUST GAS TREATMENTAPPARATUS ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3763 5

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19079590 CRYOPUMP SYSTEM KING, BRIAN M 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2025
19073144 METHOD FOR REGENERATING CRYOPUMP KING, BRIAN M 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
18951888 METHOD FOR REGENERATING CRYOPUMP MENGESHA, WEBESHET 3763 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18944117 METHOD FOR VACUUM-EXHAUSTING BY MEANS OF CRYOPUMP MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18826608 EXHAUST GAS TREATMENTAPPARATUS ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024

Managing Cryo H&I Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cryo H&I Inc. have?

Cryo H&I Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cryo H&I Inc. applications?

Brian M King has the most, with 2 of Cryo H&I Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Cryo H&I Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month