Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cumulus Neuroscience Limited

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Cumulus Neuroscience Limited holds a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently features 1 pending office action. This level of activity suggests a focused effort on securing intellectual property for their neuroscience-related devices, with one application currently undergoing active review.

The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This concentration indicates that the company's current filings are situated within a specific technical niche. Focusing on 1 distinct art unit allows the company to tailor its prosecution strategy to the specific requirements and tendencies of that administrative group, potentially leading to more efficient outcomes.

MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently active. The progress of the portfolio is directly linked to the review and decisions made by this single examiner, making their individual examination history a critical factor for the company's legal strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY 1 64.1% +33.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18573386 SIZE-ADJUSTABLE EEG HEADSET MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY 100d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3794 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18573386 SIZE-ADJUSTABLE EEG HEADSET MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY 3794 §103 Final Rejection 100d overdue Pending Dec 21, 2023

Managing Cumulus Neuroscience Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month