Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Curtin University

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Curtin University currently oversees a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with 3 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. PIHONAK, SARAH is designated as the busiest examiner for the university, currently managing 1 pending case.

The presence of the 3 distinct art units indicates that the university's research and development efforts in Chemistry & Materials span several different technical classifications. Because each of the 3 pending office actions is assigned to a different examiner, the prosecution strategy must account for unique sets of examiner behaviors and preferences. The busiest examiner, PIHONAK, SARAH, holds 1 pending case, which is the same volume as the other examiners involved. This distribution suggests that no single examiner or art unit dominates the current prosecution landscape for Curtin University, requiring a broad but individualized approach to the pending matters. Practitioners should note that the current activity provides a diverse technical foundation, allowing the university to test various claim strategies across multiple examination groups simultaneously without being overly dependent on the discretion of one individual.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PIHONAK, SARAH 1 61.3% +42.6%
KIM, BRYAN 1 28.4% +36.8%
PREGLER, SHARON 1 78.0% +21.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18001487 TREATMENT METHODS AND FORMULATIONS PIHONAK, SARAH 31d overdue
17922951 MODIFIED LUPIN PROTEIN KIM, BRYAN —
17786674 THERMAL BATTERY PREGLER, SHARON —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18001487 TREATMENT METHODS AND FORMULATIONS PIHONAK, SARAH 31d overdue
17922951 MODIFIED LUPIN PROTEIN KIM, BRYAN —
17786674 THERMAL BATTERY PREGLER, SHARON —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1627 1
1792 1
1772 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18001487 TREATMENT METHODS AND FORMULATIONS PIHONAK, SARAH 1627 §103§112 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Dec 12, 2022
17922951 MODIFIED LUPIN PROTEIN KIM, BRYAN 1792 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 02, 2022
17786674 THERMAL BATTERY PREGLER, SHARON 1772 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 17, 2022

Managing Curtin University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month