Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHEN, YU | 1 | 67.9% | +29.7% |
| COTHRAN, BERNARD E | 1 | 45.5% | +15.9% |
| SAXENA, AKASH | 1 | 48.8% | +31.2% |
| JIANG, HAIMEI | 1 | 52.1% | +31.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18057238 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODELING OF A THREADED FEATURE USING COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN | COTHRAN, BERNARD E | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17585641 | Method for Suggesting Mates for a User Selected Modeled Component | JIANG, HAIMEI | 21d |
| 18057238 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODELING OF A THREADED FEATURE USING COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN | COTHRAN, BERNARD E | 26d |
| 18788590 | System and Method for Retrieval of Two Dimensional Drawings | CHEN, YU | — |
| 18046972 | System and Methods for Automatic Repair of Missing Mate References | SAXENA, AKASH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2613 | 1 |
| 2188 | 1 |
| 2142 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18788590 | System and Method for Retrieval of Two Dimensional Drawings | CHEN, YU | 2613 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 30, 2024 |
| 18057238 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODELING OF A THREADED FEATURE USING COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN | COTHRAN, BERNARD E | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Nov 21, 2022 |
| 18046972 | System and Methods for Automatic Repair of Missing Mate References | SAXENA, AKASH | 2188 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 17, 2022 |
| 17585641 | Method for Suggesting Mates for a User Selected Modeled Component | JIANG, HAIMEI | 2142 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 21d | Pending | Jan 27, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial