Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GUDORF, LAURA A | 1 | 80.7% | +11.3% |
| COTHRAN, BERNARD E | 1 | 45.5% | +15.5% |
| WATHEN, BRIAN W | 1 | 84.1% | +15.8% |
| JIANG, HAIMEI | 1 | 51.0% | +31.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18918572 | ENSURING REMOTE ACCESS BY A WORKER TO A CORRECT TWO-DIMENSIONAL (2D) DRAWING | GUDORF, LAURA A | 9d |
| 18049390 | Propagation of corner connection elements across a 3D model | WATHEN, BRIAN W | 56d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18918572 | ENSURING REMOTE ACCESS BY A WORKER TO A CORRECT TWO-DIMENSIONAL (2D) DRAWING | GUDORF, LAURA A | 9d |
| 17585641 | Method for Suggesting Mates for a User Selected Modeled Component | JIANG, HAIMEI | 21d |
| 18057238 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODELING OF A THREADED FEATURE USING COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN | COTHRAN, BERNARD E | 26d |
| 18049390 | Propagation of corner connection elements across a 3D model | WATHEN, BRIAN W | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2876 | 1 |
| 2151 | 1 |
| 2142 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18918572 | ENSURING REMOTE ACCESS BY A WORKER TO A CORRECT TWO-DIMENSIONAL (2D) DRAWING | GUDORF, LAURA A | 2876 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | Oct 17, 2024 |
| 18057238 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODELING OF A THREADED FEATURE USING COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN | COTHRAN, BERNARD E | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Nov 21, 2022 |
| 18049390 | Propagation of corner connection elements across a 3D model | WATHEN, BRIAN W | 2151 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Oct 25, 2022 |
| 17585641 | Method for Suggesting Mates for a User Selected Modeled Component | JIANG, HAIMEI | 2142 | §103 | Final Rejection | 21d | Pending | Jan 27, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial