Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Deepin Technologies LLC is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area with 3 pending office actions. These actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units. This distribution shows that the company's patent filings are spread across different specialized groups within the patent office, rather than being concentrated in one area. The busiest examiner, KHANDKER, RAIHAN R, holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action.
Since there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for exactly one action. This lack of concentration means that a practitioner must deal with 3 distinct examiners, each potentially having a different approach to prosecution. Furthermore, the 3 distinct art units may have different allowance rates or technical requirements. The strategy for Deepin Technologies LLC must be flexible enough to address the variety presented by 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units across the 3 pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KHANDKER, RAIHAN R | 1 | 64.2% | +57.2% |
| MANNAN, MIKAIL A | 1 | 68.5% | +23.5% |
| KOO, BENJAMIN K | 1 | 57.1% | +49.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18471024 | LANDING ZONE MARKER FOR FLOW DIVERTING STENT | MANNAN, MIKAIL A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18174624 | ASPIRATION CATHETER INCLUDING A LUBRICIOUS INNER LINER AND FLEXIBLE DISTAL TIP | KOO, BENJAMIN K | 42d overdue |
| 18476018 | INTRASACCULAR NECK BRIDGING DEVICE | KHANDKER, RAIHAN R | 14d |
| 18471024 | LANDING ZONE MARKER FOR FLOW DIVERTING STENT | MANNAN, MIKAIL A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3771 | 1 |
| 3774 | 1 |
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18476018 | INTRASACCULAR NECK BRIDGING DEVICE | KHANDKER, RAIHAN R | 3771 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Sep 27, 2023 |
| 18471024 | LANDING ZONE MARKER FOR FLOW DIVERTING STENT | MANNAN, MIKAIL A | 3774 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 20, 2023 |
| 18174624 | ASPIRATION CATHETER INCLUDING A LUBRICIOUS INNER LINER AND FLEXIBLE DISTAL TIP | KOO, BENJAMIN K | 3783 | §102 | Final Rejection | 42d overdue | Pending | Feb 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial