Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

DeepMind Technologies Limited

Technology area: Computing & Software

54 pending office actions • 32 art units • 50 examiners • 8 of 54 (15%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

DeepMind Technologies Limited has 56 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The portfolio spans 53 examiners and 34 art units, indicating extensive distribution across examination personnel and technical groups. The lower examiner count relative to pending matters shows some repeated examiner assignments, while the art-unit count reflects substantial technical breadth.

TRAN, TAN H is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That recurring assignment supports a targeted review of examiner treatment, but it represents only a limited concentration within the broader portfolio.

The 34 art units create a substantial need for structured coordination. Counsel should organize recurring claim and eligibility issues by art unit, compare treatment where examiners recur, and preserve matter-specific analysis for the many distinct examination paths.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

54
Total Pending OAs
38
Non-Final OAs
16
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

32
Hard (59%)
19
Medium (35%)
3
Easy (6%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (4%)
§101 + other23 (43%)
§103 only19 (35%)
§112 only2 (4%)
Double-patenting only1 (2%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (13%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
13% of docket
33
Information Tech
61% of docket
8
Communications
15% of docket
1
Semiconductors
2% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
7% of docket
1
Business / Other
2% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

540 h
Manual time on pending OAs
108 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
189 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
4.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRAN, TAN H 2 61.3% +32.3%
ROY, SANCHITA 2 72.3% +47.1%
FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA 2 28.6% +30.0%
HAN, KYU HYUNG 2 41.2% +39.4%
BUKSA, CHRISTOPHER ALLEN 1 73.5% +18.5%
REFAI, RAMSEY 1 50.7% +12.6%
YI, HYUNGJUN B 1 34.5% +30.2%
PHAM, ANNIE 1 90.0% +11.1%
LIU, XIAO 1 87.5% +12.3%
BEZUAYEHU, SOLOMON G 1 75.7% +29.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18951101 GENERATING TRAINING DATA USING A GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORK PHAM, ANNIE —

Hard Cases (32)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18277729 NOWCASTING USING GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA 38d overdue
18127551 ALLOCATING COMPUTING RESOURCES BETWEEN MODEL SIZE AND TRAINING DATA DURING TRAINING OF A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TAN, DAVID H 38d overdue
17959232 NEURAL NETWORKS WITH TRANSFORMED ACTIVATION FUNCTION LAYERS HADDAD, MAJD MAHER 31d overdue
19111985 TRAINING POLICY NEURAL NETWORKS IN SIMULATION USING SCENE SYNTHESIS MACHINE LEARNING MODELS BUKSA, CHRISTOPHER ALLEN —
18878496 SIMULATING INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES FOR CONTROL REFAI, RAMSEY —
18945375 UNSUPERVISED LEARNING OF OBJECT KEYPOINT LOCATIONS IN IMAGES THROUGH TEMPORAL TRANSPORT OR SPATIO-TEMPORAL TRANSPORT LIU, XIAO —
18849935 MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS WITH COUNTERFACTUAL INTERVENTIONS NYE, LOUIS CHRISTOPHER —
18846412 REINFORCEMENT LEARNING TO EXPLORE ENVIRONMENTS WERNER, MARSHALL L —

Interview Candidates (14)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19111985 TRAINING POLICY NEURAL NETWORKS IN SIMULATION USING SCENE SYNTHESIS MACHINE LEARNING MODELS BUKSA, CHRISTOPHER ALLEN —
18878496 SIMULATING INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES FOR CONTROL REFAI, RAMSEY —
18872883 NEURAL NETWORKS WITH REGULARIZED ATTENTION LAYERS YI, HYUNGJUN B —
18951101 GENERATING TRAINING DATA USING A GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORK PHAM, ANNIE —
18945375 UNSUPERVISED LEARNING OF OBJECT KEYPOINT LOCATIONS IN IMAGES THROUGH TEMPORAL TRANSPORT OR SPATIO-TEMPORAL TRANSPORT LIU, XIAO —
18935365 TRAINING IMAGE REPRESENTATION NEURAL NETWORKS USING CROSS-MODAL INTERFACES BEZUAYEHU, SOLOMON G —
18668080 CONTROLLING AGENTS BY TRANSFERRING SUCCESSOR FEATURES TO NEW TASKS TRAN, TAN H —
18443285 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING SUB-GOALS GENERATED BY LANGUAGE MODEL NEURAL NETWORKS ROY, SANCHITA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2146 5
1685 5
2141 3
2145 3
2143 3
2124 2
2148 2
2126 2
2147 2
2125 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19111985 TRAINING POLICY NEURAL NETWORKS IN SIMULATION USING SCENE SYNTHESIS MACHINE LEARNING MODELS BUKSA, CHRISTOPHER ALLEN 3658 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2025
18878496 SIMULATING INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES FOR CONTROL REFAI, RAMSEY 3664 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
18872883 NEURAL NETWORKS WITH REGULARIZED ATTENTION LAYERS YI, HYUNGJUN B 2146 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 09, 2024
18951101 GENERATING TRAINING DATA USING A GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORK PHAM, ANNIE 2662 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18945375 UNSUPERVISED LEARNING OF OBJECT KEYPOINT LOCATIONS IN IMAGES THROUGH TEMPORAL TRANSPORT OR SPATIO-TEMPORAL TRANSPORT LIU, XIAO 2664 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18935365 TRAINING IMAGE REPRESENTATION NEURAL NETWORKS USING CROSS-MODAL INTERFACES BEZUAYEHU, SOLOMON G 2674 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2024
18849935 MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS WITH COUNTERFACTUAL INTERVENTIONS NYE, LOUIS CHRISTOPHER 2141 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18885422 GENERATING TRAINING DATA USING AN AUDIO GENERATION MODEL SMITH, SEAN THOMAS 2659 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18846412 REINFORCEMENT LEARNING TO EXPLORE ENVIRONMENTS WERNER, MARSHALL L — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2024
18844798 TRAINING OBJECT DISCOVERY NEURAL NETWORKS AND FEATURE REPRESENTATION NEURAL NETWORKS USING SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING SACKALOSKY, COREY MATTHEW 2128 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18843608 AGENT CONTROL THROUGH CULTURAL TRANSMISSION KASSIM, HAFIZ A 3623 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 03, 2024
18794786 USING VISUAL LANGUAGE MODELS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS OF IMAGE ELEMENTS WITHIN GRAPHICAL IMAGES PATEL, JAYESH A 2677 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 05, 2024
18834208 CONTROLLING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AGENTS USING GEOMETRIC POLICY COMPOSITION JANSEN II, MICHAEL J 2626 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024
18754726 DISTRIBUTIONAL REINFORCEMENT LEARNING HUANG, YAO D 2124 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 26, 2024
18668080 CONTROLLING AGENTS BY TRANSFERRING SUCCESSOR FEATURES TO NEW TASKS TRAN, TAN H 2141 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 17, 2024
18666682 GENERATING PREDICTIONS FOR NON-STATIONARY DATA USING DISTRIBUTIONS OVER OUTPUT HEAD WEIGHTS RUDY, ANDREW J 3668 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2024
18665702 VERIFICATION OF AGENT OUTPUT THROUGH ADVERSARIAL DEBATE VO, STEVEN 2148 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2024
18661188 Dynamic Controlled Decoding TRAN, QUOC A 2145 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2024
18639686 BLACK-BOX OPTIMIZATION USING NEURAL NETWORKS SIPPEL, MOLLY CLARKE 2126 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2024
18636971 TRAINING A POPULATION OF ADVERSARIAL NEURAL NETWORKS TO IMPROVE A BASE NEURAL NETWORK HARPER, ELIYAH STONE 2166 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18698218 DEMONSTRATION-DRIVEN REINFORCEMENT LEARNING MRABI, HASSAN 2147 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 03, 2024
18623952 GENERATING DISCRETE LATENT REPRESENTATIONS OF INPUT DATA ITEMS WU, NICHOLAS S 2148 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18443285 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING SUB-GOALS GENERATED BY LANGUAGE MODEL NEURAL NETWORKS ROY, SANCHITA 2146 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 15, 2024
18424687 GENERATING ENVIRONMENT MODELS USING IN-CONTEXT ADAPTATION AND EXPLORATION ACOSTA, RILEY SULLIVAN 2143 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 26, 2024
18423239 TRAINING A NEURAL NETWORK TO PERFORM AN ALGORITHMIC TASK USING A SELF-SUPERVISED LOSS HICKS, AUSTIN JAMES 2142 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 25, 2024
18422620 NEURAL POPULATION LEARNING MAMILLAPALLI, PALLAVI 2147 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 25, 2024
18406995 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING AMORTIZED Q LEARNING CHEN, ALAN S 2125 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2024
18527211 HIERARCHICAL TEXT GENERATION USING LANGUAGE MODEL NEURAL NETWORKS TRACY JR., EDWARD 2656 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 01, 2023
18285519 LEARNING DIVERSE SKILLS FOR TASKS USING SEQUENTIAL LATENT VARIABLES FOR ENVIRONMENT DYNAMICS FIGUEROA, KEVIN W 2124 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2023
18374447 DISCRETE TOKEN PROCESSING USING DIFFUSION MODELS ROY, SANCHITA 2146 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 28, 2023
18283131 TRAINING GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS USING A DE-NOISING OBJECTIVE TRAN, TAN H 2141 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 20, 2023
18278473 CONTINUAL LEARNING NEURAL NETWORK SYSTEM TRAINING FOR CLASSIFICATION TYPE TASKS LAHAM BAUZO, ALVARO SALIM 2146 §103 Final Rejection — AI Ready Aug 23, 2023
18277729 NOWCASTING USING GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA 2857 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 38d overdue AI Ready Aug 17, 2023
18230056 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING AUXILIARY PREDICTION NEURAL NETWORKS THAT GENERATE STATE VALUE ESTIMATES CHEN, KUANG FU 2143 §103 Final Rejection 50d AI Ready Aug 03, 2023
18275542 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING STATE ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING FOR LONG-TERM CREDIT ASSIGNMENT CHUANG, SU-TING 2146 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 02, 2023
18275332 RENDERING NEW IMAGES OF SCENES USING GEOMETRY-AWARE NEURAL NETWORKS CONDITIONED ON LATENT VARIABLES AHN, CHRISTINE YERA 2615 §103 Final Rejection 39d AI Ready Aug 01, 2023
18275052 ATTENTION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH SHORT-TERM MEMORY UNITS CADY, MATTHEW ALAN 2127 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 31, 2023
18275145 TEMPORAL DIFFERENCE SCALING WHEN CONTROLLING AGENTS USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING SPRATT, BEAU D 2143 §103 Final Rejection — AI Ready Jul 31, 2023
18273594 PREDICTING COMPLETE PROTEIN REPRESENTATIONS FROM MASKED PROTEIN REPRESENTATIONS LUO, JAMMY NMN 1686 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 21, 2023
18271611 GENERATING NEURAL NETWORK OUTPUTS BY ENRICHING LATENT EMBEDDINGS USING SELF-ATTENTION AND CROSS-ATTENTION OPERATIONS KIM, SEHWAN 2129 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 10, 2023
18034989 PREDICTING PROTEIN STRUCTURES USING PROTEIN GRAPHS KHAN, ARSHAD HUSSAIN 1686 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 02, 2023
18034280 PREDICTING PROTEIN STRUCTURES OVER MULTIPLE ITERATIONS USING RECYCLING SMITH, JENNIFER JOY 1685 §101§102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 27, 2023
18127551 ALLOCATING COMPUTING RESOURCES BETWEEN MODEL SIZE AND TRAINING DATA DURING TRAINING OF A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TAN, DAVID H 2145 §102§103 Final Rejection 38d overdue AI Ready Mar 28, 2023
18027571 PREDICTING SYMMETRICAL PROTEIN STRUCTURES USING SYMMETRICAL EXPANSION TRANSFORMATIONS FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA 1685 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2023
18026376 PREDICTING PROTEIN STRUCTURES BY SHARING INFORMATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS AND PAIR EMBEDDINGS BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 1685 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2023
18025689 TRAINING PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION NEURAL NETWORKS USING REDUCED MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1685 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 10, 2023
17960051 COMPOSITIONAL GENERALIZATION FOR REINFORCEMENT LEARNING KIM, HARRISON CHAN YOUNG 2145 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 04, 2022
17959232 NEURAL NETWORKS WITH TRANSFORMED ACTIVATION FUNCTION LAYERS HADDAD, MAJD MAHER 2125 §101§103 Final Rejection 31d overdue AI Ready Oct 03, 2022
17914035 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAINING A SPARSE NEURAL NETWORK WHILST MAINTAINING SPARSITY HAN, KYU HYUNG 2123 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2022
17798111 LEARNING MACHINE LEARNING INCENTIVES BY GRADIENT DESCENT FOR AGENT COOPERATION IN A DISTRIBUTED MULTI-AGENT SYSTEM HAN, KYU HYUNG 2123 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 08, 2022

View all 54 →

Managing DeepMind Technologies Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does DeepMind Technologies Limited have?

DeepMind Technologies Limited has 54 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 32 art units and 50 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most DeepMind Technologies Limited applications?

Tan H Tran has the most, with 2 of DeepMind Technologies Limited's pending office actions.

What technology area are DeepMind Technologies Limited's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month