Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Corey Matthew Sackalosky, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as SACKALOSKY, COREY MATTHEW

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 2128 2141 2145 2148 2183 3629

This examiner grants 64% of resolved cases

Analysis

SACKALOSKY, COREY MATTHEW works in tech center 3600 and art unit 2128. Across 47 resolved cases, the allowance rate is 63.8%, the interview lift is 29.7%, and the median time to allowance is 1520 days. The small record limits broad inference, while the timing figure points to a potentially extended prosecution path.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Dell Products L.P., and Capital One Services LLC are the leading companies. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, K&L Gates LLP, and BakerHostetler are the leading firms. The interview result supports considering examiner discussions, particularly where written responses alone may not efficiently resolve claim interpretation issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

63.8%
Allow Rate
+11.8% vs TC avg
80
Total Applications
+29.7%
Interview Lift
1520
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 47 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

40.6%
§101 Eligibility
13.7%
§102 Novelty
37.1%
§103 Obviousness
8.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18033668 DYNAMIC MODEL SCOPE SELECTION FOR CONNECTED VEHICLES Final Rejection Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
18333554 MACHINE LEARNING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, SERVER, AND PROGRAM Final Rejection FUJIFILM Corporation
18357086 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FEDERATED LEARNING Final Rejection Capital One Services, LLC
18073269 CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON LAYER-WISE ADAPTIVE CHANNEL PRUNING Non-Final OA SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
18190745 MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR PREDICTIVE MULTI-VARIATE TEMPORAL FEATURE IMPACT DETERMINATIONS Final Rejection Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
18184174 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING PREDICTIVE OUTCOMES FOR SCENARIOS USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Final Rejection Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
18644621 IMPROVEMENT TOOL RECOMMENDATION ENGINE Non-Final OA State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
18099364 SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE DEVICES FOR TRAINING ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE MODELS USING ADAPTIVE DATA-SAMPLING Final Rejection Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
18429282 MACHINE LEARNING FOR TABULAR DATA Non-Final OA Fujitsu Limited
17348246 AUTOMATICALLY AND EFFICIENTLY GENERATING SEARCH SPACES FOR NEURAL NETWORK Non-Final OA Lemon Inc.
17731691 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SPECTROSCOPIC PREDICTION OF SUBSURFACE PROPERTIES USING MACHINE LEARNING Non-Final OA Saudi Arabian Oil Company
18430289 MACHINE LEARNING DEVELOPMENT USING LANGUAGE MODELS Non-Final OA MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC
17984350 MACHINE LEARNING BASED CODE MAPPING Non-Final OA ADP, Inc.
18197347 RESOURCE FORECASTING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES Final Rejection Dell Products L.P.
17814055 EFFICIENT SAMPLING OF EDGE-WEIGHTED QUANTIZATION FOR FEDERATED LEARNING Non-Final OA Dell Products L.P.
18844798 TRAINING OBJECT DISCOVERY NEURAL NETWORKS AND FEATURE REPRESENTATION NEURAL NETWORKS USING SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING Non-Final OA DeepMind Technologies Limited
17580251 DOMAIN BATCH BALANCING FOR TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM WITH DATA FROM MULTIPLE DATASETS Non-Final OA GM Cruise Holdings LLC

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Corey Matthew Sackalosky's allowance rate?

63.8% of resolved applications examined by Corey Matthew Sackalosky were allowed (47 resolved cases), compared with 38.7% across Art Unit 2128 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Corey Matthew Sackalosky?

This examiner's interview lift is +29.7 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Corey Matthew Sackalosky take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Corey Matthew Sackalosky took 1,520 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Corey Matthew Sackalosky work in?

Corey Matthew Sackalosky examines applications in Art Unit 2128 in Tech Center 3600 (Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month