Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dejana Truck & Utility Equipment Company LLC currently manages 1 pending office action. This action is situated within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio's current activity is concentrated, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This singular focus indicates that the company's active prosecution is limited to a specific technical niche at this time.
Hanh Van Tran is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for the 1 pending office action. This single action constitutes the entirety of the pending workload for the portfolio. Because there is only 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution footprint is highly focused. Practitioners can expect a streamlined communication process with the office given the lack of multiple points of contact.
The 1 pending office action in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems defines the current status of the company's filings. Hanh Van Tran is the only individual among the 1 distinct examiners involved. This concentration means that the company's immediate prosecution success relies on the outcome of this single action. The data suggests a very narrow administrative and technical scope for the current pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, HANH VAN | 1 | 74.0% | +14.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18432224 | SHELVING SYSTEMS | TRAN, HANH VAN | 56d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18432224 | SHELVING SYSTEMS | TRAN, HANH VAN | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3637 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18432224 | SHELVING SYSTEMS | TRAN, HANH VAN | 3637 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Feb 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial