Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Dematic Corp.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Dematic Corp. is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area and has 4 pending office actions. These actions are spread across 4 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a diverse but small-scale prosecution landscape. This distribution means that every pending action is being reviewed by a different individual.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is HESS, DOUGLAS A, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This accounts for a portion of the 4 total pending actions currently active for the company. With 4 distinct examiners for the 4 actions, each examiner is handling exactly one matter across the 2 distinct art units involved. The 1 pending office action assigned to HESS, DOUGLAS A is the only one for that examiner.

For a practitioner, the presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's chemistry and materials filings are split between two different technical groups. Managing 4 pending office actions across 4 distinct examiners requires attention to four different prosecution styles. The strategy must be tailored to the specific requirements of each of the 2 distinct art units while addressing the 4 active matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
2
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
2
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HESS, DOUGLAS A 1 88.8% +10.7%
WAGGONER, TIMOTHY R 1 71.6% +7.7%
KOCH, GEORGE R 1 72.9% +17.3%
RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C 1 78.4% +15.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19108249 AUTOMATIC SELF ALIGNING AND SELF SUSTAINING BELT TRACKING SYSTEM FOR BELTED CONVEYORS HESS, DOUGLAS A —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18480610 LABEL PRINTER APPLICATOR FOR A CONVEYOR SYSTEM KOCH, GEORGE R —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17983095 RFID ENABLED WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C 29d
19108249 AUTOMATIC SELF ALIGNING AND SELF SUSTAINING BELT TRACKING SYSTEM FOR BELTED CONVEYORS HESS, DOUGLAS A —
18480610 LABEL PRINTER APPLICATOR FOR A CONVEYOR SYSTEM KOCH, GEORGE R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1745 1
3653 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19108249 AUTOMATIC SELF ALIGNING AND SELF SUSTAINING BELT TRACKING SYSTEM FOR BELTED CONVEYORS HESS, DOUGLAS A — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 03, 2025
18999663 ROBOTIC AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM AND METHOD OF STORING ARTICLES WAGGONER, TIMOTHY R — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
18480610 LABEL PRINTER APPLICATOR FOR A CONVEYOR SYSTEM KOCH, GEORGE R 1745 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2023
17983095 RFID ENABLED WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C 3653 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Nov 08, 2022

Managing Dematic Corp.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month