Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Dewalch Technologies Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Dewalch Technologies Inc. has 8 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters involve 2 distinct examiners and 1 art unit, showing that the pending portfolio is concentrated in one technical examination setting while being divided between two examiner assignments. This structure supports coordinated review of claim scope, disclosure positions, and recurring objections.

AHMAD, FARIA F is the busiest examiner, with 4 pending matters. That examiner handles half of the pending workload, while the remaining matters are assigned elsewhere. Counsel should prioritize consistency across the matters before AHMAD, FARIA F, but should preserve separate response analysis for the other examiner’s matters. The shared art unit may support a common technical framework, subject to matter-specific prosecution needs.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
2
Medium (29%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (43%)
§102 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHMAD, FARIA F 4 76.5% +8.6%
BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J 3 67.6% +26.0%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17143146 Electronic Locking Apparatus and Method AHMAD, FARIA F 46d overdue
18739294 ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD AHMAD, FARIA F —
18642759 Securing Apparatus and Method BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J —
16983891 ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD AHMAD, FARIA F —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18642759 Securing Apparatus and Method BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J —
16988660 Securing Apparatus, System and Method BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J —
16945914 Retained Lock System and Method BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3675 7

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18739294 ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD AHMAD, FARIA F 3675 §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18642759 Securing Apparatus and Method BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J 3675 §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 22, 2024
17143146 Electronic Locking Apparatus and Method AHMAD, FARIA F 3675 §101DP Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending Jan 06, 2021
17087612 ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD AHMAD, FARIA F 3675 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 02, 2020
16988660 Securing Apparatus, System and Method BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J 3675 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 09, 2020
16983891 ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD AHMAD, FARIA F 3675 §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 03, 2020
16945914 Retained Lock System and Method BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J 3675 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 02, 2020

Managing Dewalch Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Dewalch Technologies Inc. have?

Dewalch Technologies Inc. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Dewalch Technologies Inc. applications?

Faria F Ahmad has the most, with 4 of Dewalch Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Dewalch Technologies Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month