Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (40%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 1 | 25.2% | +23.1% |
| QAYYUM, ZESHAN | 1 | 40.4% | +31.3% |
| LOFTIS, JOHNNA RONEE | 1 | 43.1% | +4.9% |
| BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN | 1 | 81.0% | +12.2% |
| SHAPIRO, JEFFREY ALAN | 1 | 55.0% | +15.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17786220 | SELF-SERVICE TERMINAL AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SELF-SERVICE TERMINAL | BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN | 27d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18961696 | METHOD OF OPERATION FOR A TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND AN AUTOMATED TRANSACTION MACHINE | WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 71d |
| 18934938 | Distributed Ledger Applications | QAYYUM, ZESHAN | — |
| 17621757 | Providing Service to Automated Banking Machines | LOFTIS, JOHNNA RONEE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17786220 | SELF-SERVICE TERMINAL AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SELF-SERVICE TERMINAL | BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN | 27d |
| 18961696 | METHOD OF OPERATION FOR A TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND AN AUTOMATED TRANSACTION MACHINE | WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 71d |
| 18934938 | Distributed Ledger Applications | QAYYUM, ZESHAN | — |
| 17762040 | APPARATUS FOR HANDLING NOTES OF VALUE | SHAPIRO, JEFFREY ALAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3694 | 1 |
| 3697 | 1 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| 2662 | 1 |
| 3619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18961696 | METHOD OF OPERATION FOR A TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND AN AUTOMATED TRANSACTION MACHINE | WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 3694 | §101§102§112 | Non-Final OA | 71d | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
| 18934938 | Distributed Ledger Applications | QAYYUM, ZESHAN | 3697 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 01, 2024 |
| 17621757 | Providing Service to Automated Banking Machines | LOFTIS, JOHNNA RONEE | 3625 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 22, 2021 |
| 17786220 | SELF-SERVICE TERMINAL AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SELF-SERVICE TERMINAL | BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN | 2662 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Jun 16, 2022 |
| 17762040 | APPARATUS FOR HANDLING NOTES OF VALUE | SHAPIRO, JEFFREY ALAN | 3619 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial