Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Djt 22 LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, AVILA, STEPHEN P, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The portfolio's activity is restricted to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused technical scope for the company's current filings.
The use of 1 distinct examiner means that the company's immediate prosecution success depends on the review of AVILA, STEPHEN P. Practitioners can concentrate their resources on addressing the specific concerns of this one examiner within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company is not currently diversifying its patent efforts across different USPTO departments.
With 1 pending office action, the portfolio's current administrative requirements are straightforward. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 is identical to the total number of pending actions, confirming that the entire active workload is under a single person's jurisdiction. This centralized prosecution allows for a highly specific response strategy tailored to the current examiner and art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVILA, STEPHEN P | 1 | 80.3% | +10.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18196529 | Pontoon Boat with Planing Panels | AVILA, STEPHEN P | 16d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18196529 | Pontoon Boat with Planing Panels | AVILA, STEPHEN P | 16d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18196529 | Pontoon Boat with Planing Panels | AVILA, STEPHEN P | 3615 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 16d overdue | Pending | May 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial