Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Doublepoint Technologies OY has 2 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. PETER D MCLOONE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action.
The 2 pending office actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for one matter. This distribution indicates that no single examiner is overwhelmed by the company's current filings. The 2 distinct art units suggest that each action is being reviewed within a different technical group. PETER D MCLOONE is one of the two individuals managing the current workload in the Communications area.
Because the 2 pending office actions are located in 2 distinct art units, the technical focus of the portfolio is divided. The prosecution team must manage relationships with 2 distinct examiners, including PETER D MCLOONE. Each of these 2 distinct examiners handles 1 pending office action. This arrangement requires a strategy that addresses the individual preferences of both examiners while operating across different art units. The 1 pending office action managed by PETER D MCLOONE represents half of the company's active matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCLOONE, PETER D | 1 | 82.9% | +3.3% |
| PARCHER, DANIEL W | 1 | 61.2% | +57.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19243024 | Point-and-select system and methods | MCLOONE, PETER D | 2d overdue |
| 18522516 | Pinch state detection system and methods | PARCHER, DANIEL W | 54d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18522516 | Pinch state detection system and methods | PARCHER, DANIEL W | 54d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2621 | 1 |
| 2174 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19243024 | Point-and-select system and methods | MCLOONE, PETER D | 2621 | §102§103Other | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Jun 19, 2025 |
| 18522516 | Pinch state detection system and methods | PARCHER, DANIEL W | 2174 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 54d | Pending | Nov 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial