Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Drff LLC is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates a highly centralized prosecution strategy where all current patent office feedback is filtered through a single technical and administrative channel. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the applicant's current intellectual property efforts are confined to a specific mechanical or commercial niche.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ADAMOS, THEODORE V, who is managing 1 pending office action. As this represents the total pending activity for the company, the examiner's specific interpretation of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field will be decisive. With 1 pending action assigned to 1 distinct examiner, the applicant can focus resources on a single set of examiner concerns without the complexity of managing multiple simultaneous office action responses. This 1 to 1 ratio between actions and examiners simplifies the management of the current portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 1 | 55.4% | +44.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18787487 | FORMING, DRAINAGE AND VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE, IRRIGATION AND ATHLETIC FIELDS | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 43d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18787487 | FORMING, DRAINAGE AND VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE, IRRIGATION AND ATHLETIC FIELDS | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 43d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18787487 | FORMING, DRAINAGE AND VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE, IRRIGATION AND ATHLETIC FIELDS | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 3635 | §102§103§112Other | Final Rejection | 43d | Pending | Jul 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial